Case Summary (G.R. No. 110027)
Background and Initial Contracts
At the heart of the controversy is a parcel of unregistered land designated as Lot 1 of Plan Psu-205035, measuring 19,545 square meters. This property was initially part of a larger agricultural land parcel declared in the name of Domingo Lozada in 1916. After Domingo's death, the property was divided between Nicomedes and the heirs of his brother Pablo through an Extrajudicial Settlement in 1965. Nicomedes sold the property conditionally to Emma Reyes and subsequently to Rosario Bondoc, leading to multiple conflicting claims over ownership.
Timeline of Sales and Agreements
Nicomedes Lozada entered a Deed of Conditional Sale with Emma Reyes on June 23, 1965, which stipulated that ownership would remain with Nichomedes until full payment was made. However, Emma only paid the first installment. On June 14, 1968, Nicomedes then sold the property to Rosario Bondoc in an Agreement of Purchase and Sale, also stipulating a payment plan. Both buyers failed to fulfill their payment obligations fully, resulting in complications regarding ownership claims.
Legal Proceedings and Initial Rulings
After Nicomedes’ death in 1972, his heirs executed an Extrajudicial Settlement of Estate, maintaining their claim over the property. However, conflicting applications for land registration led to the judicial determination of ownership. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasay City ruled on November 25, 1991, declaring Maria Cristobal and Dulos Realty as rightful owners and dismissing the claims of Emma and Rosario.
Court of Appeals Decision
The Court of Appeals, ruling on June 17, 1999, reversed the RTC’s decision, recognizing Rosario Bondoc's title over the property based on her Agreement of Purchase and Sale. The appellate court emphasized that the respective contracts with Nicomedes were contracts to sell rather than absolute sales, as ownership had not been transferred due to non-payment.
Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court undertook a comprehensive analysis and concluded that both contracts—Emma's Deed of Conditional Sale and Rosario's Agreement of Purchase and Sale—did not effectuate a transfer of ownership due to the failure to complete payment terms. The court reiterated the distinction between contracts to sell and contracts of sale. It ruled that the only valid and registrable interests in the property were those of Maria Cristobal and Dulos Realty, as their transactions constituted absolute sales.
Implications of th
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 110027)
Case Overview
- This case involves two petitions for review on certiorari challenging the Court of Appeals' decision that reversed the Regional Trial Court's (RTC) ruling regarding the ownership and title of an unregistered parcel of land in Tungtong, Las Piñas.
- The petitions were filed by Spouses Emma H. Ver Reyes and Ramon Reyes, and by Maria Q. Cristobal and Dulos Realty & Development Corporation, against several respondents including Dominador Salvador, Sr.
Background of the Disputed Property
- The subject property is a 19,545 square meter parcel of unregistered land that was once part of a larger agricultural estate declared in the name of Domingo Lozada in 1916.
- Domingo had two marriages and produced children from both unions, with his estate being divided among them after his death.
Contracts Involved
- Deed of Conditional Sale (1965): Nicomedes, son of Domingo, sold the property to Emma Ver Reyes, stipulating that ownership would only transfer upon full payment.
- Agreement of Purchase and Sale (1968): Nicomedes sold the same property to Rosario D. Bondoc, with similar conditions regarding payment and transfer of ownership.
- Deed of Absolute Sale (1969): Nicomedes sold a portion of the property to Maria Q. Cristobal.
Court Proceedings
- Nicomedes filed for registration of the p