Title
Supreme Court
Ventis Maritime Corp. vs. Cayabyab
Case
G.R. No. 239257
Decision Date
Jun 21, 2021
Seafarer diagnosed with schizophrenia after onboard stress; entitled to Grade 6 disability benefits under POEA-SEC, not CBA, with 6% interest on award.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 239257)

Background of the Employment

Cayabyab was hired by Ventis Maritime Corporation, a local manning agency, on July 9, 2012, to work aboard the vessel "M/V Dover Highway" for nine months at a monthly salary of USD 422.00. He underwent a Pre-Employment Medical Examination (PEME), which found him fit for duty. As part of his role, Cayabyab reported that he deprived himself of meals to assist crew members, leading to deterioration in his mental health.

Emergence of Psychological Issues

Cayabyab began to exhibit unusual behaviors including erratic sleeping patterns, paranoia, and violent outbursts while onboard. On February 25, 2013, the captain of the vessel informed the employer about his deteriorating condition, leading to his subsequent confinement in a psychiatric clinic in Italy. The attending physician diagnosed him with Occupational Stress Disorder and recommended immediate repatriation due to acute psychosis.

Diagnosis and Disability Assessment

Upon returning to the Philippines, Cayabyab was evaluated by a company-designated physician who concurred in the diagnosis, prescribing medications for schizophrenia. Over a series of follow-ups, he received a Grade 6 disability rating but later sought a second opinion from his personal physician, Dr. Elias D. Adamos, who diagnosed him with total and permanent disability.

Labor Arbiter’s Ruling

On February 21, 2014, the Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Cayabyab, awarding him total and permanent disability benefits amounting to USD 60,000.00. This decision was prompted by the findings of a debilitating psychological condition due to work-related stress.

NLRC’s Decision

The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) later modified this ruling on October 31, 2014, awarding only partial disability benefits corresponding to the Grade 6 rating under the POEA-SEC. This decision was confirmed as final on January 18, 2015, after Cayabyab's motion for reconsideration was denied.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The Court of Appeals (CA) upheld the NLRC's decision, affirming the partial disability classification. The CA emphasized that Cayabyab did not timely seek an evaluation from his personal physician before filing his complaint, which undercut his claims. The CA ordered the petitioners to jointly pay Cayabyab Grade 6 disability benefits in accordance with the provisions of the CBA.

Arguments Presented by Petitioners

The petitioners contended that the CBA had expired prior to Cayabyab’s employment and that the provisions of the POEA-SEC should apply instead. They further argued that the imposition of 6% legal interest on the judgment award was unwarranted since it was not included in Cayabyab's pleadings.

Ruling of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that Cayabyab could not claim benefits under the CBA as he failed to establish the CBA's existence, his employment’s coverage, and t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.