Title
Vda. de Jacob vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 88602
Decision Date
Apr 6, 1990
Dr. Jacob's estate contested a mortgage foreclosure, alleging SPA forgery. SC upheld the foreclosure, writ of possession, and damages, ruling mortgagee rights survive mortgagor's death.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 88602)

Background and Events

Dr. Alfredo E. Jacob, the registered owner of the parcel of land under Transfer Certificate of Title No. 1433, entered into a financial arrangement in 1972 due to financial burdens such as realty taxes and unpaid wages of farm laborers. Jorge Centenera was granted a special power of attorney by Dr. Jacob to secure a loan from Bicol Savings & Loan Association. Over time, Dr. Jacob's inability to repay the loans led to multiple restructuring agreements executed by Centenera on behalf of Dr. Jacob, culminating in a series of defaults.

Legal Proceedings and Actions Taken

After Dr. Jacob’s death on March 9, 1979, foreclosure proceedings commenced despite arguments concerning the legitimacy of the mortgage and authority of Centenera. The bank executed a public auction on May 11, 1979, following which the property was sold to the respondent bank, prompting Tomasa Vda. de Jacob to file suit, alleging that the mortgage and associated documents were forged. The Regional Trial Court dismissed her complaint due to lack of evidence and found in favor of the defendants, awarding damages.

Appeals and Judicial Findings

Unsuccessful in her appeal to the Court of Appeals, Tomasa elevated the matter to the Supreme Court, raising issues concerning the validity of the extrajudicial foreclosure post-mortem and the award of damages. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' findings, indicating that the mortgagee's right to foreclose does not cease with the mortgagor's death, according to Section 7, Rule 86 of the Rules of Court.

Conclusion on the Right to Foreclose

The ruling clarified that the inability of the mortgagor to respond does not impede the mortgagee's rights outlined by law. This includes the ability to foreclose after the mortgagor’s death, with the authority residing primarily in the mortgagee for their protection. Thus, the extrajudicial proceedings followed

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.