Title
Vda. de Bataclan vs. Medina
Case
G.R. No. L-10126
Decision Date
Oct 22, 1957
Bus tire burst caused overturn and fire, killing passengers; carrier held liable for negligence, damages increased.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 13601)

Facts of the Case

• On September 13, 1952, Medina’s bus No. 30 departed Amadeo, Cavite, bound for Pasay City with approximately eighteen occupants.
• While traveling at excessive speed, a front tire burst. The bus zig-zagged some 150 meters before overturning into a roadside canal, trapping four passengers (including Juan Bataclan) inside.
• Calls for help were made; ten men arrived carrying a lighted bamboo torch. Gasoline leaking from the overturned chassis ignited, consuming the bus and the trapped passengers.
• The charred bodies of the four victims were recovered and identified; plaintiff Bataclan’s widow filed suit for compensatory, moral, exemplary damages, and attorneys’ fees.

Key Dates

• Accident: September 13, 1952, at approximately 2:00 AM
• Trial Court Decision: undisclosed date prior to appeal
• Supreme Court Decision: October 22, 1957

Applicable Law (New Civil Code of the Philippines)

• Art. 1733 – Common carriers must exercise extraordinary diligence for passenger safety and goods.
• Art. 1755 – Obliges carriers to use the utmost diligence of very cautious persons.
• Art. 1756 – Presumption of fault in case of passenger injury or death unless diligence is proven.
• Art. 1759 – Carrier liable for employee negligence, even if beyond scope of authority.
• Art. 1763 – Carrier responsible for third-party acts if proper supervision could have prevented harm.

Trial Court Findings

• The Court of First Instance held Medina liable for breach of the transportation contract.
• It found negligence by driver Conrado Saylon—excessive speed caused the tire blow-out and overturning.
• The trial court, viewing the fire as the proximate cause of death, awarded P1,000 compensatory damages, P600 attorneys’ fees, and P100 for lost merchandise.

Proximate Cause and Liability Analysis

• The Supreme Court applied the standard definition: the proximate cause is the act which, in a continuous and natural sequence, produces the injury without any efficient intervening cause.
• Overturning, not the post-accident fire, was held the proximate cause of death. Gasoline leakage and the rescuers’ use of a torch were foreseeable consequences of the overturn.
• The driver and conductor failed to warn rescuers of the gasoline spill, aggravating the carrier’s liability under Arts. 1733, 1759, and 1763.

Modification of Damages

• Considering Bataclan’s earning capacity and other factors, the award for his death was increased to P6,000 (inclusive of compensatory and moral damages).
• Attorneys’ fees were raised to P800, reflecting the services rendered at trial and on appeal.
• The P100 award for lost merchandise was affirmed



...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.