Title
The United States vs. Mateo Lapus et al.
Case
G.R. No. 1222
Decision Date
Jan 21, 1905
A 1902 armed raid on Cabiao by "Santa Iglesia" members, targeting authorities and wealthy landowners, led to sedition convictions for violence and intimidation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 1222)

Allegations and Incident Description

The complaint filed by the provincial fiscal alleged that on June 3, 1902, a group of approximately four hundred armed men, including the accused, conducted a tumultuous raid on Cabiao. This group was reported to have fired their weapons, instigated panic among the townspeople, and committed acts of violence, including the abduction of sixty to seventy residents. The victims were taken to various locations, threatened, and told about the injustices they endured at the hands of wealthy landowners. The leaders of the band identified themselves as members of an illegal association, stating their intent to continue their actions against perceived oppression from authorities and wealthy individuals.

Criminal Acts and Legal Basis

The actions taken by the defendants constituted sedition, as defined under paragraphs 3 and 4 of Section 5 and punishable by Section 6 of Act No. 292 of the Civil Commission. The acts included attacking the town, intimidating residents, and making threats against public officials. The defendants were implicated as members of an illegal association and had committed violent acts with political motives, thus satisfying the legal definition of sedition.

Evidence and Witness Testimonies

The prosecution’s case relied heavily on witness testimonies from individuals who experienced the assault and identified the defendants as members of the armed band. Notably, the municipal president and justice of the peace of Cabiao provided corroborating statements about the attackers’ intentions and actions. These accounts underscored the organized nature of the raid, supporting the claim of a politically motivated crime.

Defense Claims and Verdict

Despite pleading not guilty, the defense did not produce sufficient evidence to rebut the incriminating testimonies presented by the prosecution. As such, the defe

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.