Title
People vs. Narvaes
Case
G.R. No. 390
Decision Date
Oct 22, 1901
Justice of the peace acquitted of official dereliction; no unlawful gambling proven in his house, negating liability for failing to prosecute non-criminal acts.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 390)

Facts of the Case

The controversy arises from allegations that Narvaes permitted the game of monte to be played on multiple occasions, specifically on August 15 and 20, and November 27, 1892, at his residence, which also contained the justice court. Additionally, monte was played in another property owned by him in San Isidro during a local holiday celebration. Witness testimonies, including individuals who participated in the gambling, supported these claims.

Applicable Legal Framework

The legal basis for the charges was rooted in article 355 of the Penal Code, which deals with official dereliction, and article 343, which pertains to unlawful gambling. The court needed to determine whether Narvaes, as a justice of the peace, failed in his duty to prosecute the illegal gambling activities taking place in his domain.

Determination of Offense

Despite the allegations against Narvaes, the court found it essential to ascertain if the crime of unlawful gambling had indeed been committed. Article 343 specifies criminal responsibility for bankers, owners of gambling establishments, and players involved in games of chance within designated gambling houses. However, the court noted that there was insufficient evidence to categorize Narvaes's home as a gambling house, which is a requirement for culpability under article 343.

Legal Conclusion

The court concluded that since Narvaes's residence was not recognized as a gambling house, the specific offense of unlawful gambling had not occurred, and consequently, official d

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.