Case Summary (G.R. No. 81561)
Background of the Trademark Dispute
On December 11, 1962, General Milling Corporation applied for registration of the trademark "All Montana." This application was in conflict with an earlier registration held by Unno Commercial Enterprises, which claimed that it began using the trademark as an indentor or broker for S.H. Huang Bros. & Co. back in June 1956. The Trademark Office initiated an interference proceeding to determine the rightful owner of the trademark.
Evidence and Arguments Presented
General Milling Corporation alleged that it initiated the use of the trademark "All Montana" on August 31, 1955, and had the right to use it through a deed of assignment from Centennial Mills, Inc. In contrast, Unno Commercial Enterprises argued that they were the rightful owners of the trademark based on their previous registration and claimed use. The evidence included various documents indicating shipments of wheat flour under that trademark to the Philippines.
Decision of the Director of Patents
The Director of Patents ruled in favor of General Milling Corporation, considering it as the prior user of the trademark. The ruling noted that "All Montana" is geographically descriptive and, therefore, not inherently distinctive. It allowed for registration on the Supplemental Register only and canceled the certificate issued to the Petitioner. The Court highlighted that mere distributors do not gain trademark rights without a valid transfer of ownership.
Appeal by the Petitioner
Following the adverse ruling, Unno Commercial Enterprises sought the reversal of the decision through a petition. They contended that their ownership was validated through several shipments and noted that the appropriation of a trademark was not limited to manufacturers but could include parties lawfully engaged in commerce.
Legal Principles Governing Trademark Ownership
The decision articulated crucial legal principles, establishing that trademark ownership is predicated on actual use and that mere registration does not confer rights if the applicant is not the original owner of the mark. The ruling clarified that only the actual owner, or someone duly authorized by the owner, can apply for registration of a trademark.
Findings on Proof of Ownership
The Court reaffirmed the findings of the Director of Patents, asserting that substantial evidence supported Centennial Mills, Inc. as the prior user and owner of the trademark "All Montana." As the trademar
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 81561)
Introduction
- This case involves a dispute over the trademark "All Montana" used for wheat flour in the Philippines between Unno Commercial Enterprises, Incorporated (petitioner) and General Milling Corporation (respondent).
- The case was decided by the First Division of the Philippine Supreme Court on February 28, 1983, under G.R. No. L-28554.
- The core issue revolves around the registration and ownership of the trademark, as well as the rights of importers and distributors in trademark law.
Background of the Case
- Respondent General Milling Corporation filed for the registration of the trademark "All Montana" on December 11, 1962, asserting its prior use since August 31, 1955.
- Petitioner Unno Commercial Enterprises, Inc. claimed ownership of the trademark, having registered it on March 8, 1962, and alleged its use since June 30, 1956.
- An interference proceeding was initiated to resolve the conflicting claims to the trademark, with Unno as the Senior Party and General Milling as the Junior Party.
Findings of the Director of Patents
- The Director of Patents ruled in favor of General Milling Corporation, recognizing it as the prior user of the trademark "All Montana."
- The ruling was based on evidence that "All Montana" flour is a premium product sourced from Montana, USA, implying that the trademark is geographically descriptive.
- The Director emphasized that only the actual owner of a trademark has the