Title
University of the Philippines vs. City Fiscal of Quezon City
Case
G.R. No. L-18562
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1961
UP editors challenged criminal sedition charges over a scholarly article; Supreme Court upheld fiscal's authority, ruling academic freedom doesn't exempt from legal liability.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 169942)

Facts of the Case

Petitioners Fonacier and Yabes served as the editor and managing editor of the Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review, which is dedicated to scholarly work in the social sciences and humanities. This publication is not intended for widespread public distribution; instead, it is primarily circulated within the University of the Philippines and select academic institutions abroad. During the University’s Golden Jubilee in July 1959, the contentious article was published. Subsequently, on June 7, 1961, a complaint was lodged against them by Carlos Albert, alleging incitement to sedition under Article 142 of the Revised Penal Code. Following a preliminary investigation initiated by the City Fiscal, there were impending threats to file formal charges against the petitioners.

Legal Issues Presented

The primary issue for determination is whether the City Fiscal should be enjoined from filing criminal charges against the petitioners for publishing the aforementioned article. The petitioners contended that the potential legal action constitutes harassment and a misuse of public power, infringing upon their academic freedom guaranteed by the Constitution.

Court's Analysis on Criminal Prosecution

The court identified that it is within the respondent City Fiscal's duty to investigate complaints of criminal offenses and file appropriate charges when warranted by the evidence. A guiding principle established in jurisprudence dictates that injunctions or writs of prohibition are typically not available to inhibit criminal prosecutions unless it poses an affront to orderly justice or is exploited in a vindictive manner.

Conclusion on the Injunction Request

Upon reviewing the allegations and the context of the case, the court found no sufficie

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.