Title
Unitra Maritime Manila, Inc., VT Maritime Inc., and/or Capt. Victor M. Villanueva vs. Giovannie B. Campanero
Case
G.R. No. 238545
Decision Date
Sep 7, 2022
Seafarer Campanero, diagnosed with work-related spinal condition, awarded total disability benefits after company physician failed to issue timely assessment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 142773)

Employment Background

Giovannie B. Campanero was employed as a Second Officer by Unitra Maritime Manila, Inc., for its principal VT Maritime, under a contract aligned with the POEA Standard Employment Contract and All Japan Seaman's Union CBA. He began his tenure on April 22, 2014, and subsequently boarded the M/V Mount Akaboshi on May 29, 2014.

Medical Issues and Treatment

Campanero started experiencing health issues shortly after boarding, including weakness in his lower extremities and severe lower back pain. Despite these symptoms, he continued working until he sought medical evaluation while in Japan, where he was diagnosed with a disc hernia and eventually repatriated for further treatment in the Philippines. Upon return, medical findings revealed serious conditions culminating in a spinal arteriovenous malformation. Surgery was performed to correct the issues, but his health continued to decline, leading him to seek further medical opinions due to the withholding of medical assistance from his employer following his surgery.

Findings of Medical Experts

Dr. Francis Pimentel and Dr. Rogelio Catapang provided independent evaluations confirming the severity of Campanero's medical conditions, including paraplegia and sensory deficits, and indicated that his work conditions likely contributed to his injuries. They concluded that his afflictions rendered him permanently unfit for work.

Initial Rulings and Appeal Process

The Labor Arbiter (LA) initially ruled in favor of Campanero, awarding him total permanent disability compensation. However, the NLRC overturned this decision, asserting that Campanero's conditions were not work-related and citing his failure to obtain a second medical opinion before pursuing his labor complaint. The NLRC's ruling was contested in a Petition for Certiorari, which the Court of Appeals granted, reinstating the LA's decision based on the principle that the assessment of the company-designated physician was not final if conflicting medical opinions existed.

Supreme Court's Review and Decision

The Supreme Court highlighted that a seafarer’s illness needs to be work-related and occurred during the employment term to receive benefits. It reiterated that the burden lies on the employer to disprove such illnesses being work-related unless proven otherwise. The Court found that there was a reasonable link between Campanero’s work and his medical conditions. Medical evaluations supported that his duties contributed to the illness, and the failure of the company-designated physician to render a definite assessment within the legal timeframe undermined the employer's position.

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.