Title
United States Tobacco Corp. vs. Luna
Case
G.R. No. L-3875
Decision Date
Jul 6, 1950
US Tobacco Corp. imported leaf tobacco based on government assurance, shipments in transit before new import law; SC ruled release justified, honoring prior govt commitment, import date as shipment, not arrival.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-3875)

Relevant Legislation

Republic Act No. 330, enacted in July 1948, authorized the Philippine President to regulate the importation of non-essential or luxury articles. Subsequent to this, Executive Order No. 295 was issued on November 29, 1949, detailing the requirements for import licenses. Notably, leaf tobacco was not included in the list of restricted items under this order. However, the landscape changed with the approval of Republic Act No. 426 on May 19, 1950, which placed leaf tobacco under import control, instituting a necessity for an import license.

Initial Inquiry and Subsequent Shipments

Harry S. Stone hill, President of the United States Tobacco Corporation, posed inquiries to Secretary Cornelio Balmaceda regarding the importation of Virginia leaf tobacco. Secretary Balmaceda clarified that the importation of this commodity did not require a license, provided it was treated as part of initial investments without any remittance of foreign exchange. Following this assurance, multiple shipments of leaf tobacco were made to the Philippines, arriving in June 1950.

Legislative Developments and Import Control Board Actions

With the enactment of Republic Act No. 426, the Import Control Board placed restrictions on the importation of leaf tobacco, necessitating an import license for these shipments. Consequently, the Commissioner of Customs refused to release the shipments consigned to the United States Tobacco Corporation, asserting that the goods were subject to the newly established import regulations despite them being en route prior to the act's enactment.

Legal Interpretation of Import Regulations

The crux of the legal issue lies in whether the goods in transit at the time of Republic Act No. 426's approval were subjected to the new regulations. The law's provisions specified the importance of import licenses for items initially deemed uncontrolled. Importantly, the determination of the date of importation was critical; it was established that the date of shipment—rather than the date of arrival—should be considered the legal date of importation.

Ruling on the Validity of Import Actions

The court concluded that since the United States Tobacco Corporation's shipments left prior to the enactment of Republic Act No. 426, they were not illegal under the new law. The insistence by the respondents on legal formalities contravened the principle of fairness, especially after a governme

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.