Title
United Coconut Planters Bank, Inc. vs. E. Ganzon, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 244247
Decision Date
Nov 10, 2021
EGI defaulted on loans from UCPB, restructured debt, and transferred properties. UCPB overcharged, foreclosed, and retained units fraudulently. Court ruled UCPB committed fraud, voided transactions, ordered refund, return of units, and awarded damages to EGI.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 244247)

Loan Background and Defaults

Between 1995 and 1998, EGI obtained five separate loans from UCPB totaling ₱775 million. Beginning December 1998, EGI defaulted. The parties restructured by granting EGI a short-term ₱150 million loan and later entered a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) fixing EGI’s total outstanding debt at ₱915.838 million and agreeing to settle it by transferring 485 real properties.

Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and Amendment Terms

Under the MOA (December 1999) and its January 2000 Amendment, EGI agreed to assign 485 listed condominium units and land parcels to UCPB “free and clear,” and UCPB agreed that upon satisfactory transfer the ₱915.838 million debt would “be deemed paid and extinguished.” The Amendment adjusted the aggregate appraised value of the properties from ₱1.374 billion to ₱1.419 billion.

Foreclosure and Dacion en Pago Transactions

UCPB foreclosed 193 of the 485 units, applying the bid price of ₱723.592 million (80% of the appraised value) against the debt, then required EGI to convey 107 additional units by dacion en pago worth ₱166.127 million. UCPB still claimed an unpaid balance and sought further assets.

EGI’s Complaint and Lower Courts’ Rulings

EGI filed suit for annulment of foreclosure and dacion en pago, rescission/amendment of contracts, collection, damages, and replevin of 28 titled units held “for safekeeping.” The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found UCPB breached the MOA by undervaluing properties, held EGI had overpaid, and awarded EGI excess proceeds, value of movables, value of 28 units, damages, fees, and mortgage releases. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed with modifications, reducing overpayment to ₱154.78 million and adjusting awards and interest rates.

Supreme Court on Contracts of Adhesion and Post-MOA Interest

The Supreme Court held:

  • MOA and Amendment are not contracts of adhesion, having been extensively negotiated.
  • By their express terms, interest, charges, and fees were inclusive in the ₱915.838 million obligation; no further interest accrues post-MOA.

Nature of MOA as Dacion en Pago and Obligation Extinguishment

The MOA is effectively a dacion en pago: an obligation to give properties to extinguish a money debt. Extinguishment depends on transfer of all 485 listed assets, not on their market or appraised values. The obligation is indivisible, yet the partial transfers made were recognized as partial performance.

Computation of EGI’s Excess Payment

Recognizing payments under the MOA:
• Appraised value of 193 foreclosed units: ₱904,491,052.00
• Dacion en pago proceeds from 107 units: ₱166,127,368.50
Total payments: ₱1,070,618,420.50
Less original obligation: ₱915,838,822.50
Excess payment: ₱154,779,598.00

Allocable Transaction Costs under MOA

MOA Section 6.3 places “taxes, charges, fees, costs and expenses” of implementing its transfer modes on EGI. Foreclosure-related costs (₱72,071,440.28) are chargeable to EGI; costs of subsequent dacion en pago for additional assets are deemed grossly disproportionate to the remaining obligation and thus borne by UCPB. Net excess after deducting foreclosure costs: ₱82,708,157.72.

Movable Properties and Letter of Undertaking

EGI’s own December 31, 1999 letter confirmed that “Condominium Assets, inclusive of the fixtures, facilities, improvements and other personal assets” would be subjected to foreclosure. Therefore, EGI is estopped from claiming depreciation value of movables; these belong to UCPB.

Common Areas and Condominium Corporation Obligation

The 28 disputed units (lobbies and valet parking slots) are common areas under the Condominium Act (R.A. 4726) and cannot be individually conveyed or their titles returned to EGI. Instead, EGI must organize a condominium corporation within 90 days of finality to hold common-area




...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.