Title
Supreme Court
United Church of Christ in the Philippines, Inc. vs. Bradford United Church of Christ, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 171905
Decision Date
Jun 20, 2012
A religious corporation's disaffiliation from a national church was upheld by the Supreme Court, affirming its autonomy, valid amendments, and right to use its name, while denying the national church's legal standing to challenge the actions.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 171905)

Ecclesiastical Affairs Versus Secular Corporate Questions

Matters purely ecclesiastical (doctrine, worship, sacraments, discipline) lie outside civil courts. However, BUCCI’s decision to disaffiliate and amend its charter involves secular corporate rights—legal steps subject to SEC review. Disputes over membership and affiliation in a corporate context are not purely religious.

Validity of BUCCI’s Disaffiliation

Under both UCCP’s 1974 and 2005 Constitutions and its Basis of Union, local churches enjoy autonomy. The power to withdraw from UCCP by amending articles and by-laws is consistent with the congregationalist polity expressly preserved in UCCP’s governing documents.

SEC Approval and Presumption of Regularity

SEC’s July 2, 1993 approval of BUCCI’s amended articles carries a presumption of regularity. Absent clear evidence of procedural defect or grave abuse of discretion, SEC’s factual determinations stand, and the Supreme Court will not substitute its own appraisal.

Right to Continued Use of the Corporate Name

Philippine law prohibits corporate names that are identical, confusingly similar, or deceptive. BUCCI’s long lineage and prior use established priority. The Court of Appeals correctly found no likelihood of confusion between “BUCCI” and “UCCP,” given distinct identities and naming conventions required by UCCP.

Locus Standi of UCCP to Challenge Amendments

A real party in interest must have a material stake in the outcome. Once disaffiliated, UCCP ceased to be a member of BUCCI and thus lacked standing to contest BUCCI’s charter amendments and corporate name usage. SEC and the Court of Appeals properly dismissed UCCP’s protest on standing grounds.

Noncompliance with Rule 45 Requirements

UCCP’s

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.