Title
Ui vs. Bonifacio
Case
A.C. No. 3319
Decision Date
Jun 8, 2000
A lawyer accused of immorality and falsifying a marriage certificate was reprimanded for document tampering but cleared of gross misconduct due to lack of evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 135042)

Allegations and Initiation of Disbarment Proceedings

In December 1987, Leslie Ui discovered Carlos Ui’s relationship with Atty. Bonifacio, resulting in a 1986 child and a second child in December 1988. Upon petitioner’s confrontations in mid-1988 and March 1989, Respondent persisted in the illicit relationship and obtained employment with Carlos Ui’s company. Petitioner filed an administrative complaint for gross immorality before the IBP Commission on Bar Discipline on August 11, 1989.

Respondent’s Answer and Counterclaims

Respondent maintained she believed Carlos Ui to be single when they met in 1983, married him in Hawaii (allegedly October 22, 1985), and did not cohabit in the Philippines. She asserted that upon learning of his first marriage in June 1988 she severed ties and returned to Honolulu until March 1989. By counterclaim, she sought ₱10 million in moral damages for malicious prosecution.

Dismissal of Criminal Complaint for Concubinage

Meanwhile, a criminal complaint for concubinage was filed against Respondent and Carlos Ui in Rizal (I.S. No. 89-5247) but dismissed for lack of proof of cohabitation. The Secretary of Justice upheld the dismissal on appeal.

Marriage Certificate Discrepancy and Contempt Motion

Petitioner moved to cite Respondent for contempt, alleging she knowingly filed an altered marriage certificate showing October 22, 1985 instead of the true 1987 date, in violation of RPC Arts. 183 and 184. Respondent claimed she relied in good faith on the copy provided by Carlos Ui.

IBP Commission on Bar Discipline Findings

The Commission found credible Respondent’s belief in Carlos Ui’s bachelor status, her departure upon learning the truth, and absence of cohabitation after March 1989. It concluded that Respondent was more victim than perpetrator and that no willful, flagrant or shameless conduct warranting disbarment had been shown.

IBP Board of Governors’ Resolution

On December 13, 1997, the IBP Board adopted the Commission’s recommendation: dismiss the complaint for lack of merit but reprimand Respondent for knowingly attaching a falsified marriage certificate, with warning against repetition.

Legal Standards on Good Moral Character and Disbarment

Under the 1987 Constitution and the Rules of Court, admission to and retention in the Bar require continuous good moral character. Disbarment may follow “grossly immoral conduct,” defined as willful, flagrant or shameless acts reflecting moral indifference to community norms.

Supreme Court’s Assessment of Respondent’s Conduct

The Court agreed that Respondent, believing in the validity of her

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.