Title
People vs. Villanueva
Case
G.R. No. 1017
Decision Date
Mar 21, 1903
Jealous husband shot wife, causing severe injury; convicted of frustrated parricide, mitigated by jealousy, aggravated by treachery, sentenced to 8+ years.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 1017)

Facts of the Case

On the night of July 9, 1902, Villanueva shot Aguinaldo with a revolver at a close range of approximately three yards while she was ascending the stairs of their residence. The bullet penetrated her back and exited near her breast. Although the wound was serious and potentially lethal, Aguinaldo survived and was reported to be healing by August 7, 1902.

Crime Classification

The acts committed by Villanueva constituted the crime of frustrated parricide, as defined under the relevant penal code articles. The evidence demonstrated that Villanueva intended to kill Aguinaldo, as he used a deadly weapon and aimed at a critical part of her body. The fact that she did not die was due to fortuitous circumstances and not to any action on Villanueva's part.

Defendant’s Defense

During arraignment, Villanueva admitted to the act but disclaimed criminal intent, claiming that his jealousy, stirred by suspicions of infidelity, prompted his actions. He asserted that upon confronting his wife and observing her actions post-encounter with another individual, he lost control and shot her.

Intent and Circumstances

The court found that Villanueva's act of shooting Aguinaldo was intentional, as there was no reasonable evidence suggesting it was a non-volitional act. Although he experienced a state of passionate jealousy, the ruling clarified that such emotional turmoil does not absolve him of criminal responsibility.

Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances

The ruling acknowledged mitigating circumstance No. 7 of Article 9 of the Penal Code, regarding action fueled by passion; however, it also recognized the aggravating circumstance of treachery (alevosia) as outlined in Article 10. The perpetrator's calculated approach to the act contributed to the classification of the offense as a serious crime, thus elevating its gravity.

Penalty Imposed

Considering the entirety of the circumstances, the court decided to impose a penalty one degree lower than that prescribed for cadena temporal, leading to a sentence of eight years and one day o

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.