Title
People vs. Siatong
Case
G.R. No. 2298
Decision Date
Dec 28, 1905
Siatong, sentenced to death for murder, escaped and was later captured. After amnesty and release, fiscal’s defective certiorari petition denied due to improper form.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 188064)

Factual Background

The defendant, Ignacio Siatong, was found guilty by a military commission for murder and sentenced to death. The sentence was approved by competent authorities but was not executed due to Siatong's escape. Upon recapture, the military commission had already ceased operations. The Court of First Instance determined that Siatong was included in an amnesty declared on July 4, 1902, which led to his release after he took the necessary oath.

Appeal and Government Desist

The provincial fiscal, acting on behalf of the prosecution, appealed the Court of First Instance’s decision to release Siatong, citing that the government representative felt the appeal was improper and subsequently withdrew from it. Instead of pursuing the appeal, the government sought to utilize the remedy of certiorari, contending that the Court of First Instance had exceeded its jurisdiction in rendering its judgment.

Certiorari Remedy Analysis

The court analyzed the appropriateness of the certiorari remedy sought by the provincial fiscal. The ruling emphasized that the petition for certiorari must be filed as a formal complaint that adheres to the procedural requirements outlined in the Code of Procedure in Civil Actions. The fiscal's filing, which was essentially a brief within a criminal cause rather than a formal complaint, did not satisfy these legal requirements.

Conclusion of the Court

Due to the inappropriateness of the certiorari petition as filed, the court found it necessary to set aside the government's petition. Furthermore, since the g

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.