Title
People vs Samson
Case
G.R. No. 5807
Decision Date
Jul 27, 1910
Ricardo Samson acquitted of illegal firearm possession; carried shotgun under owner’s instruction with valid permit, lacking intent to possess.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 5807)

Facts of the Case

Samson was found in possession of a shotgun belonging to Pablo Padilla, who had the legal permit to possess the firearm. Evidence presented in court indicated that Padilla had instructed Samson to carry the shotgun on his behalf while he followed on horseback for a hunting trip. During the proceeding, Samson confirmed his possession of the gun while asserting that the permit for the firearm was under Padilla's name.

Legal Proceedings and Judgment

The Court of First Instance initially sentenced Samson to pay a fine of P50 or, in case of insolvency, to undergo subsidiary imprisonment at the rate of one day for every P2.50. This sentence prompted Samson to appeal the decision.

Legal Analysis and Conclusion

The central legal issue in this case revolves around the interpretation of "illegal possession of firearms." The court determined that carrying a firearm as directed by its lawful owner does not, in itself, constitute illegal possession. The custodianship that Samson undertook was performed without the intention of claiming ownership over the weapon. Consequently, the court acquitted Samson of the charges against him and reversed the lower court's judgment, ordering that the costs be borne by the government. This decision rests on the principle that temporary possession, under the authorit

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.