Title
People vs Peralta
Case
G.R. No. L-3273
Decision Date
Jul 13, 1907
Father and son seized a 2-year-old to pressure his family, assaulted his grandmother, and detained him illegally, leading to an 8-year sentence under Article 481 of the Penal Code.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-3273)

Facts of the Case

On April 18, 1904, a complaint was filed accusing Quirino and Vicente Peralta of committing the crime of kidnapping with injuries, specified under Article 484 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 587. The events in question occurred on November 1, 1903, when the Peraltas visited the home of Isabel Geranda in search of Esteban Gemefino. Unable to find Esteban, they assaulted Isabel and forcibly took her grandson, Cenon, tying him to a wooden pillar in their home as leverage to compel the Gemefino family to return Esteban.

Evidence Presented

The court established that the accused visited Isabel Geranda’s house to locate Esteban. When Isabel refused to hand over Cenon, the Peraltas allegedly used violence, resulting in injuries to Isabel, and forcibly removed the child. A young girl, Petronila Lagotar, witnessed the incident and was coerced into assisting the Peraltas in transporting Cenon. Eventually, Cenon was released from their custody by his brother Urbano. The accusations were formally addressed the following day when Juan Gemefino, Cenon’s father, reported the incident to the local justice of the peace.

Legal Classification of the Crime

The central legal issue revolved around the classification of the Peraltas' actions under the relevant Penal Code provisions. The complaint initially categorized their act as kidnapping under Article 484, which prescribes severe penalties for the abduction of children under the age of seven. However, the legal commentary on Article 484 indicated differing opinions regarding whether the facts presented constituted kidnapping or illegal detention. The commentators highlighted that abduction, particularly for ransom or immoral purposes, warranted harsh penalties.

Court's Findings and Legal Reasoning

The court recognized that, although the Peraltas’ intention was not to permanently deprive Cenon of his liberty, their actions constituted a wrongful exercise of control over the child to compel the Gemefino family to locate Esteban. As such, the court concluded that the p

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.