Title
People vs Mendoza
Case
G.R. No. 7540
Decision Date
Sep 23, 1912
Barrio lieutenant Vicente Mendoza acquitted as accessory after arson; principal acquitted, no liability. Neglect of duty charge overlooked.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 71412)

Factual Background

On the evening of August 1, 1910, Bernabe Mangunay approached Mateo del Rosario's home while carrying a firebrand, which led to the ignition of the house's nipa roof. Silveria Marcoleta, del Rosario's wife, raised an alarm and evacuated her children and younger brother, while the fire was extinguished in a timely manner with the help of neighbors. Following the incident, del Rosario reported it to Vicente Mendoza, who, despite summoning Mangunay, failed to take any further action against him or report the incident to higher authorities.

Legal Proceedings and Charges

The provincial fiscal filed charges against Vicente Mendoza on September 5, 1910, accusing him of being an accessory after the fact to the crime of arson, which stemmed from his inaction despite knowledge of the incident. After a trial, Mendoza was sentenced to two years, four months, and one day of correctional imprisonment, which he subsequently appealed.

Legal Analysis of Accessory After the Fact

The prosecution's case against Mendoza hinged on his alleged duty to proceed with the prosecution of Mangunay. However, it was established that had Mendoza been found criminally liable for his inaction, he should have been charged with "prevaricacion" under Article 355 of the Penal Code, which specifically addresses the neglect of duty by public officers.

Acquittal of Principal Actor Implications

Central to the court's decision was the acquittal of Bernabe Mangunay for the arson charge, attributed to a lack of evidence. Under the law, an accessory after the fact cannot be convicted if the principal act does not constitute a crime or if the principal has been acquitted. The court found that there were indications that the fire might have been accidental, which aligned with the acquittal of Mangunay.

Conclusion and Ruling

In light of these

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.