Title
People vs. Li Sui Wun
Case
G.R. No. 10670
Decision Date
Nov 4, 1915
A Chinese merchant admitted under a "section six certificate" cannot be deported for later becoming a laborer; lawful entry grants indefinite residency.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 10670)

Background Facts

Li Sui Wun entered the Philippine Islands on February 28, 1911, aboard the steamship Loongsang, using a "section six certificate" that permitted his entry without objection. The plaintiff later alleged that he was working as a laborer without formal registration as a Chinese laborer, which constituted grounds for his deportation.

Judicial Proceedings and Ruling in Lower Court

Upon reviewing the case, Judge Simplicio del Rosario of the Court of First Instance sided with the plaintiff and ruled for the deportation of Li Sui Wun. The appellant subsequently appealed this decision.

Legal Question Presented

The primary legal question raised by Li Sui Wun was whether he could be deported from U.S. territory, having entered under a "section six certificate." The decision had to consider the implications of such a certificate regarding an individual's rights to remain in the territory.

Federal Court Precedents

In previous federal court decisions, it has been indicated that a Chinese person entering the United States with a "section six certificate" could remain indefinitely, even if they later changed their occupation to that of a laborer. The doctrine emphasizes that the “section six certificate” was not meant to impose limitations on the right to stay after lawful entry.

Rights Afforded by the “Section Six Certificate”

The legal interpretation of the "section six certificate" is critical. It is not merely an instrument for entering the territory but a facilitator that places the holder on equal footing with other aliens from nations given the most favored status regarding entry and residency. The certificate does not impose restrictions on the length of stay.

Impact of Admission Circumstances

The certificate stating the purpose of entry, whether as a student, merchant, or tourist, serves to convey that the individual has fulfilled the qualifications required for lawful entry but does not restrict the duration of their right to remain post-entry. This principle was affirmed by numerous federal court decisions that highlighted the importance of lawful admission.

Decision by the Higher Court

Reaching a conclusion, the higher court agreed with the Attorney General's appeal to reverse the lower court's decision. They concluded that since Li Sui Wun entered the Philippines lawfully with a "section six certificate," he held the right to remain in the territory without the concern of deportation merel

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.