Title
People vs. Ginsolongo
Case
G.R. No. 7498
Decision Date
Sep 12, 1912
Santiago Ginosolongo fatally stabbed Corporal Padayao during a cedula inspection; convicted of homicide, not murder, due to charge limitations. Feliciano and Ciriaco acquitted for lack of evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 7498)

Facts of the Case

On October 19, 1904, in Dumanjug, police officers, acting under the direction of Lieutenant Hilarion Layaolayao, were assigned to verify the personal registration of the local citizens. Upon approaching the residence of the Ginosolongo family, Corporal Padayao was invited inside while his colleagues remained outside. During this visit, Padayao was assaulted and stabbed by Santiago Ginosolongo with a bolo after being offered a cigar, resulting in multiple wounds. In the ensuing chaos, Policemen Felix Cambonga attempted to aid Padayao but was also attacked, leading to further violence in which two Ginosolongo family members were killed.

Procedural History

The initial incident was reported to the justice of the peace court on October 21, 1904, and a preliminary investigation was conducted leading to the filing of a formal complaint in the Court of First Instance of Cebu in 1911. On November 7, 1911, each of the defendants was sentenced to twelve years and one day of reclusion temporal and was ordered to pay costs. The defendants appealed the judgment rendered against them.

Discussion on Charges

The comprehensive evaluation of facts suggests that Santiago Ginosolongo's conduct amounted to unlawful aggression against officials performing their duties, meriting characterization as murder due to the treacherous manner of the attack. However, as the complaint specifically charged homicide, the court was bound to adjudicate only on the accusation presented and not on potentially more serious charges.

Assessment of Evidence and Defense Claims

The claim of self-defense presented by Santiago Ginosolongo lacked substantiation as the records did not indicate that the police beforehand abused or provoked any member of the Ginosolongo family. Testimonies from his co-defendants contradicted Santhiago's claim, establishing that Padayao was the sole assailant at the time of the initial attack, further corroborated by the fact that any altercations took place after he was already injured.

Conclusion on Conviction and Sentencing

The court determined Santiago Ginoso

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.