Title
People vs. Dulay
Case
G.R. No. L-4026
Decision Date
Mar 7, 1908
A man seduced a young woman with promises of marriage, leading to sexual relations and pregnancy. Upon denial of paternity, he was convicted of *estupro* and ordered to support the child.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 10712)

Factual Background

In May 1904, Pascual Dulay began courting 16-year-old Gregoria Pimentel, promising to marry her. Their relationship became increasingly intimate, with Dulay ultimately seducing Pimentel multiple times between December 1905 and April 1906. On April 29, 1906, Dulay informed Pimentel's parents of his intention to marry her but later refused to fulfill his promise when it became evident that she was pregnant. He denied responsibility for the pregnancy, despite her assertion that he was the only man with whom she had been intimate.

Evidence Presented

At trial, Pimentel presented evidence, including letters and personal items sent by Dulay, which corroborated her claims of their intimate relationship. Notably, one letter urged her to confess their "sin" to her grandfather and suggested that Dulay intended to return in June, indicating premeditated deceit related to their sexual relationship and its consequences.

Legal Basis for the Charge

Dulay was charged with the crime of "estupro" (seduction), defined under Article 443, Paragraph 3 of the Penal Code. This legal provision punishes individuals who seduce a woman under the pretext of marriage, especially when the woman is under 23 years of age. The court found that Dulay's repeated promises and his intimate relations with Pimentel clearly established the elements of deception required for the charge.

Verdict and Legal Reasoning

The court determined that Dulay's refusal to marry Pimentel after seducing her constituted deceit, aligning with the legal provisions that seek to protect vulnerable individuals from exploitation. The court noted that there was no evidence suggesting Pimentel had sexual relations with anyone other than Dulay, reinforcing his culpability. Despite Dulay's argument concerning the timing of Pimentel’s pregnancy, the court stated that a delayed conception is possible, thereby rejecting his defense.

Sentencing

The ruling sentenced Dulay to four months of arresto mayor, ordered him to recognize and provide for the child, and required him to pay P1,000 in damages to P

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.