Title
People vs. Caballeros
Case
G.R. No. 1352
Decision Date
Mar 29, 1905
Two defendants acquitted as accessories after the fact in a murder case due to lack of evidence, inadmissible confession, and duress defense.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 166105)

Key Dates

  • Decision Date: March 29, 1905

Applicable Law

  • Philippine Penal Code (enacted under the Philippine Commission)
    • Article 8, paragraph 9 (irresistible force exemption)
  • Act No. 619, Section 4 (voluntariness of confessions)

Facts of the Case

The lower court convicted the defendants as accessories after the fact to murder on the ground that they assisted in burying the victims’ bodies to conceal the crime. Neither Caballeros nor Baculi was charged as principal or accomplice in the killings themselves, but both were adjudged guilty for participation in the burial.

Issue Presented

Whether the evidence supports convicting the defendants as accessories after the fact, given claims of coercion and absence from the crime scene, and whether their confessions were made freely and voluntarily.

Analysis as to Roberto Baculi

Roberto Baculi admitted aiding in the burial but testified (and was corroborated by eyewitness Teodoro Sabate) that he acted under duress. Sabate, a prosecution witness, placed Baculi harvesting bananas elsewhere when the murders occurred. According to Sabate, he was accosted by the true perpetrators—identified as Damaso and Isidoro—who forced him at gunpoint to inter the bodies. Under Article 8, paragraph 9 of the Penal Code, acts performed under “irresistible force” do not incur criminal liability. The court concluded Baculi’s conduct fell squarely within this exemption.

Analysis as to Apolonio Caballeros

There was no direct evidence placing Caballeros at the burial site or participating in the concealment. Both Baculi and Sabate affirmed that Caballeros was neither present nor involved. The lone supposed confession by Caballeros, recorded by Constabulary official Enrique Calderon, lacked voluntariness. Calderon acknowledged only Baculi’s confession was given freely; Caballeros’s purported admission stemmed from promises of leniency. Under Section 4 of Act No. 619, confessions must be voluntary, without threat, force, or promise of pardon, to be admissible.

Non-Reporting of the Crime

The trial court cited the defendants’ failure to notify authorities as further evidence of guilt. However, the Penal

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.