Title
People vs. Bayutas
Case
G.R. No. 10470
Decision Date
Oct 1, 1915
In 1913, Bayutas attacked Paras during a billiards dispute, causing serious injuries. Court ruled *lesiones graves* with treachery, rejecting self-defense claims.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 255038)

Crime and Initial Judgment

Filemon Bayutas was charged with the crime of lesiones graves, or serious physical injuries. On November 25, 1914, the trial court found Bayutas guilty and sentenced him to one year and a day of prision correctional, an indemnity of P50 for the medical treatment provided to Paras, subsidiary imprisonment for failure to pay, and the payment of court costs. Following this judgment, Bayutas appealed.

Factual Background of the Incident

On the night of the incident, after Esteban Paras and Alfonso Carvajal concluded a game of billiards, Bayutas suggested betting against Paras. Despite Paras's objections, Bayutas struck him from behind with a piece of hard wood, inflicting severe injuries. Witnesses confirmed that the initial blow hit Paras on the nape, and a subsequent strike rendered him unconscious. Dr. Cesar Mercader later examined Paras, identifying contused wounds that required 58 days to heal.

Defense Claims and Contradictions

Bayutas claimed he was provoked by Paras's challenges to fight and acted in self-defense when Paras allegedly attacked him with a billiard cue. However, the court noted significant contradictions between the testimonies of Bayutas and Paras, particularly regarding the nature and sequence of the events.

Testimony and Medical Evidence

The eyewitness testimonies reinforced the claim that Bayutas initiated the attack when Paras was vulnerable and not in a position to defend himself. Medical evidence indicated the direction and severity of the wounds supported the assertion that the attack was not an act of self-defense, as Bayutas struck from an advantageous position.

Legal Classification and Penalty

The court classified the act as a crime of lesiones graves, qualified by treachery, as provided for in Article 416 of the Penal Code. The attacking method employed by Bayutas indicated the absence of any immediate danger to himself, highlighting premeditated intent to injure. Despite the severity of the injuries, it was noted that the injuries were ultimately healed without lasting consequences, which informed the court's decision on the penalty.

Extenuating Circumstances and Final Judgment

The court recognized that the provocation from Paras may have contributed to Bayutas's loss of self-control, allowing for the consideration of mitigating circumstances. Thus,

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.