Title
Triple Eight Integrated Services, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 129584
Decision Date
Dec 3, 1998
Erlinda Osdana, recruited for Saudi Arabia, faced illegal dismissal, unpaid wages, and health issues due to unrelated tasks. Courts ruled in her favor, awarding damages and clarifying employer liability.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 129584)

Breach of Contractual Terms and Working Conditions

Upon arrival in Riyadh, Osdana was assigned menial tasks—including dishwashing, janitorial work, and cooking—contrary to her waitress designation. She endured 12-hour daily shifts without overtime pay.

Medical Treatment and Unpaid Periods

The arduous work led to numbness and pain. Osdana was confined at GCC’s Ladies Villa from June 18 to August 22, 1993, without salary. She then worked as food server and cook at Hota Bani Tameem Hospital (August 22–October 5, 1993) without compensation. A further confinement (October 6–23, 1993) also went unpaid. She was diagnosed with bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, underwent surgery in January and April 1994, and received no pay from February to April 22, 1994.

Termination and Repatriation

Discharged on April 29, 1994, allegedly for illness, Osdana received neither separation pay nor back wages. Her appeals to petitioner failed, prompting a complaint to the POEA.

Administrative Proceedings and Awards

Transferred under R.A. 8042 to the NLRC’s arbitration branch, Osdana claimed unpaid and underpaid salaries, moral and exemplary damages, attorney’s fees, and revocation of petitioner’s license. The Labor Arbiter (Aug. 20, 1996) ordered US $2,499 for unexpired contract, US $1,076 unpaid salary/differential, P50,000 moral damages, P20,000 exemplary damages, and 10% attorney’s fees. The NLRC affirmed on March 11 and denied reconsideration on April 28, 1997.

Issues on Certiorari

Triple Eight petitioned for certiorari, alleging (a) lack of factual/legal basis for the awards, and (b) improper sole liability despite joint and several responsibility with Gulf Catering Company.

Standard of Review on Quasi-Judicial Findings

Under Art. VIII § 14 of the 1987 Constitution, decisions must state facts and law. Findings of the NLRC are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence. Doubts are resolved in favor of the employee. Petitioner filed only a general denial, waived its chance to present evidence, and cannot now question the reliance on Osdana’s submissions.

Validity of Dismissal Due to Illness

Labor Code Art. 284 and Omnibus Rules Book VI, Rule 1, Sec. 8 permit dismissal for disease only upon certification by a competent public health authority that the condition is incurable within six months. No such certification—Philippine or Saudi—was presented. The post-operative medical report noted “very good improvement,” and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is non-contagious. Without proper certification, the dismissal was arbitrary and violated due process.

Constitutional Protection of Labor

The 1987 Constitution (Art. XIII § 3) guarantees workers’ security of tenure, humane conditions, and living wage. Allowing foreign employers to unilaterally dismiss an overseas worker on health grounds without required certification undermines this public policy.

Choice-of-Law and Public Policy

Lex loci contractus dictates that Philippine law governs contracts perfected in the Philippines. Foreign standards contrary to Filipino labor protections are unenforceable as against public policy.

Modification of Monetary Awards

Under R.A. 8042 § 10(5), a worker wrongfully repatriated is entitled to placement-fee reimbursement and salary for the unexpired contract or three months per unexpired year, whichever is less. Osdana’s actual service spanned 19½ months, implying one renewal; thus, the correct award for unexpired salary is four months × US $280 = US $1,120 (not US $2,499). The US $1,076 unpaid salary and differential remains proper given work referrals and unpaid confinement due to work-related injury.

Moral, Exemplary Damages and Attorney






...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.