Title
Triol vs. Agcaoili, Jr.
Case
A.C. No. 12011
Decision Date
Jun 26, 2018
Atty. Agcaoili found guilty of notarizing a fraudulent deed without parties' presence or valid commission, violating notarial rules and professional ethics, resulting in suspension and disqualification.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 12011)

Facts of the Case

The complainant, Nicanor D. Triol, and his sister Grace D. Triol co-own a parcel of land situated in Quezon City. In January 2011, Nicanor intended to sell this land to Leonardo P. Caparas but could not secure Grace's consent as she was residing in the United States. Subsequently, a Deed of Absolute Sale was allegedly executed and notarized by Atty. Delfin R. Agcaoili, Jr., purportedly transferring the property to another party without their authorization. Nicanor contended that the signatures on the deed were not authorized and that the community tax certificates used in the notarization process were falsified.

Respondent's Defense

In response to the allegations, Atty. Agcaoili denied any involvement in the execution or notarization of the deed, asserting that both his signature was forged and that he was not a commissioned notary public at the time of the notarization in question. He claimed ignorance of all parties involved and stated that he would never notarize documents without the personal appearance of the signatories.

Investigating Body's Findings

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Investigating Commissioner initially recommended the dismissal of the complaint, citing a lack of substantial evidence against the respondent. However, upon appeal, the IBP Board of Governors reversed this decision and imposed a two-year suspension on the respondent from practicing law, along with disqualification from being a notary public for the same duration. The decision indicated that the respondent failed to demonstrate the legitimacy of his specimen signature and did not prove that he had not notarized the document in question.

Court's Ruling

The Court upheld the findings of the IBP, emphasizing the vital importance of proper notarization procedures that serve public interest. Notarization is not merely a formality; it converts private documents into public ones. Section 2(b) of the 2004 Notarial Rules mandates that notaries public must confirm the identity of signatories through their personal presence and identification. The respondent's failure to adhere to these requirements constituted a breach of both the 2004 Notarial Rules and the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), under which lawyers must observe integrity and honesty.

Violation of Notarial Rules and Ethical Standards

The Court found ample evidence that Atty. Agcaoili notarized the deed without the complainant and his sister appearing before him. Furthermore, a certification from the Clerk of Court confirmed that he was not a commissioned notary at the time. The respond

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.