Title
Torm Shipping Philippines, Inc. vs. Alacre
Case
G.R. No. 229228
Decision Date
Jan 26, 2021
Seafarer Alacre claimed permanent disability benefits after a shoulder injury. The Supreme Court ruled the CBA applied, offsetting Danish compensation against POEA-SEC benefits, dismissing the case as moot.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 229228)

Employment and Medical Background

Alacre was employed on March 12, 2012, with a specified contract duration of six months and a salary of US$648.00. During his employment, he experienced shoulder pain, was diagnosed with a right shoulder and hand joint sprain, and underwent medical treatment upon his repatriation to the Philippines on July 8, 2012. Following a series of medical evaluations, the company-designated physician declared him with an interim disability grading of Grade 10, indicating significant impairment in shoulder mobility.

Development of Disability Claims

Faced with a lack of improvement, Alacre consulted an orthopedic specialist, Dr. Venancio P. Garduce, who determined that he could no longer work as a seaman and recommended a higher disability grading of Grade 3. After surgery on February 13, 2013, Alacre sought recovery of permanent total disability benefits through legal means.

Labor Arbiter's Decision

On February 21, 2014, Labor Arbiter Jaime M. Reyno ruled in favor of Alacre, awarding him US$60,000 in total permanent disability benefits and attorney’s fees, after concluding that the company-designated physician had failed to provide a definitive assessment, thus rendering his condition permanently disabling. The Labor Arbiter concluded that the applicable collective bargaining agreement (CBA) had expired, making the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration-Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC) the governing law.

National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) Ruling

Petitioners appealed this Decision to the NLRC, which, on August 29, 2014, reversed the Labor Arbiter's ruling, citing that the CBA remained effective due to a lack of termination notice and deferred ruling on the disability claim pending resolution of a claim before the Danish National Board of Industrial Injuries (NBII). Following a motion for reconsideration that was also denied, Alacre subsequently initiated a petition for certiorari with the Court of Appeals (CA) arguing that the NLRC had acted with grave abuse of discretion.

Court of Appeals Decision

The CA ruled on July 13, 2016, favoring Alacre and reinstating the Labor Arbiter's Decision. The court found that the disability unknown was total and permanent given the failure of the company-designated physician to make a definitive decision within the 240-day timeframe, and affirmed the notion of off-setting any amounts received from the NBII against the POEA-SEC benefits.

Legal Arguments Raised by Petitioners

In its certiorari petition, TORM Shipping raised several arguments alleging errors by the CA, including claims that Alacre had filed his complaint prematurely while pursuing benefits under Danish law, that the company-designated physician’s assessment should limit disability claims, and that provisions in the CBA related to off-setting had been ignored.

Court's Analysis and Ruling

The Supreme Court found merit in TORM Shipping's petition, characterizing the issues involving the applicability of the CBA and Alacre's disability grading as central to the dispute. It ruled that the CBA remained effective beyond its stated duration, emphasizing that no termination notice had been presented, thereby establishing its governing terms, especially

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.