Title
Supreme Court
TOLIONGCO vs. COURT OF APPEALS
Case
G.R. No. 231748
Decision Date
Jul 8, 2020
Seafarer sexually harassed by superior, repatriated, diagnosed with PTSD. Constructive dismissal upheld; denied disability benefits for non-compliance with 3-day medical exam rule. Awarded moral/exemplary damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 231748)

Petitioner and Respondents

Petitioner: Richard Lawrence Daz Toliongco
Respondents: Court of Appeals; National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC); Anglo-Eastern Crew Management Philippines, Inc.; Anglo-Eastern (Antwerp) NV; Gregorio B. Sialsa; corporate officers and directors; M/V Mineral Water

Employment Contract Terms

Toliongco’s seven-month contract (Oct. 30, 2013–May 2014) provided a basic monthly salary of US$ 604, overtime compensation, vacation pay, and a repatriation point in Manila. The contract incorporated POEA Memorandum Circular No. 10, s. 2010, and a Belgian collective bargaining agreement.

Facts of Sexual Harassment

On June 27, 2014, while cleaning the galley, Toliongco encountered CO Oleksiy twice. On both occasions, Oleksiy disrobed, demanded sexual acts, and physically seized Toliongco’s arm. Toliongco resisted, escaped to the smoking room, and obtained corroborative accounts from Able Seaman Desiderio Paner and Chief Cook Edenjarlou Eseo. The incidents were logged in the ship’s Deck Log Book.

Repatriation and Medical Diagnosis

Toliongco reported the harassment to the captain and sought repatriation on July 12, 2014. Company physicians reportedly examined him, but he failed to comply with the mandatory three-day post-employment medical examination. On November 24, 2014, Dr. Randy Dellosa diagnosed PTSD, later confirmed by Dr. Li-Ann Lara-Orencia, who deemed him unfit for sea duty.

Labor Complaint and Arbiter’s Findings

On March 2, 2015, Toliongco filed a labor complaint for constructive dismissal, sexual harassment, maltreatment, disability benefits, damages, and attorney’s fees. The Labor Arbiter found constructive dismissal due to a hostile work environment, awarded unpaid salary for the unexpired contract, moral damages (₱20,000), exemplary damages (₱10,000), and attorney’s fees (₱5,438.41), but denied disability benefits for non-compliance with the three-day rule.

NLRC Decision

The NLRC affirmed constructive dismissal and salary award but deleted moral and exemplary damages. It granted financial assistance of ₱30,000 and 10% attorney’s fees, again denying disability benefits for lack of proof that PTSD was work-related and for non-compliance with post-employment medical requirements.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals denied Toliongco’s certiorari petition, ruling the NLRC did not abuse discretion. It upheld the mandatory nature of the three-day medical examination and found no substantial evidence linking PTSD to employment. Awards for moral and exemplary damages were affirmed deleted.

Issues on Appeal

(1) Whether the three-day post-employment medical examination rule is mandatory or if PTSD excuses non-compliance;
(2) Whether PTSD is a work-related or work-aggravated illness under the POEA Standard Employment Contract;
(3) Whether Toliongco is entitled to moral, exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees for sexual harassment.

Mandatory 3-Day Reportorial Requirement

Under the 2010 POEA Standard Employment Contract, seafarers must undergo post-employment medical examination within three working days of repatriation, failing which disability claims are forfeited. Exceptions exist if the seafarer is physically or mentally incapacitated or if the employer prevents examination.

Work-Related Mental Disorder Analysis

Section 32 of the POEA contract confines mental disorder compensation to post-traumatic psychoneurosis caused by head injuries. Section 32-A covers occupational diseases meeting specific exposure criteria. PTSD, diagnosed without head trauma, falls outside Section 32’s schedule, requiring proof under Section 32-A that harassment aggravated the illness.

Unique Seafarer Environment as Factor

Continuous exposure aboard a vessel leaves no refuge from a harassing superior. The confined space and inabilit

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.