Title
The Learning Child, Inc. vs. Lazaro
Case
G.R. No. 143385
Decision Date
Sep 7, 2000
Parties settled illegal dismissal claims via a compromise agreement, approved by the Supreme Court, ending litigation and waiving future claims.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 143385)

Applicable Law

The decisions referenced in this case are governed by the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, given that the ruling was made in 2000. The legal framework also encompasses the Labor Code and established jurisprudence regarding labor disputes and illegal dismissals.

Procedural History

On June 16, 2000, the petitioners filed a motion requesting a 30-day extension for the submission of a petition for review on certiorari against the Court of Appeals’ decision delivered on May 24, 2000, which had affirmed a ruling from the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). The Supreme Court granted this motion on July 17, 2000.

Compromise Agreement

On the same date as the aforementioned extension, the petitioners submitted a Manifestation with Motion, which included a Compromise Agreement approved by both parties. The agreement consisted of several annexes formalizing the representation of the petitioners by Atty. Patricia Grace A. Gustilo, authorized to negotiate a settlement on behalf of both The Learning Child, Inc. and Regina Alfonso.

Terms of Settlement

The Compromise Agreement outlined the specific terms of settlement, which indicated that the respondents accepted a payment of PhP 260,000.00 as full settlement for their claims arising from the case. It stipulated that the respondents waived any additional claims against the petitioners related to the same matter and agreed not to pursue any further lawsuits or claims against them.

Dismissal of Claims

Additionally, the agreement included provisions in which the petitioners committed not to pursue their intended petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court and to dismiss their counterclaims against the respondents with prejudice. This aspect highlights the mutual understanding to resolve all disputes amicably.

Judicial Approval

Upon reviewing the Compromise Agreement, the court found that it was not contrary to law, good morals, or public policy. Consequently, the court approved the agreemen

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.