Title
Tengco vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-49852
Decision Date
Oct 19, 1989
Tenant disputes ownership, fails to pay rent; courts uphold landlord's claim, ruling no *mora accipiendi*, laches, or credible defense.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-49852)

Background of the Case

  • Emilia Tengco, the petitioner, was involved in a legal dispute with Benjamin Cifra, Jr., the private respondent, regarding a lease agreement for a property located at No. 164 Int., Gov. Pascual St., Navotas, Metro Manila.
  • Cifra filed an action for unlawful detainer against Tengco in the Municipal Court of Navotas, claiming she failed to pay rent despite repeated demands.
  • The Municipal Court ruled in favor of Cifra, ordering Tengco to vacate the premises and pay arrears in rent and attorney's fees.

Proceedings in Lower Courts

  • Tengco appealed the Municipal Court's decision to the Court of First Instance of Rizal, which affirmed the lower court's ruling.
  • Tengco subsequently filed an "Appeal by Way of Certiorari" with the Court of Appeals, which also dismissed her appeal, finding the lower courts' decisions supported by substantial evidence.

Petitioner’s Arguments

  • Tengco contended that the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the lower court decisions, asserting several points:
    • Cifra was not the legitimate owner of the leased premises.
    • The lessor was guilty of mora accipiendi (delay in accepting payment).
    • Her version of events was more credible than Cifra's.
    • Laches had barred Cifra from ejecting her.
    • Cifra failed to establish a valid cause of action against her.

Court of Appeals' Rationale

  • The Court of Appeals addressed Tengco's claims, emphasizing that:
    • Ownership of the property was a factual issue, and the trial court's findings were entitled to deference.
    • Tengco admitted to being a lessee and acknowledged her default in rental payments.
    • The claim of refusal to accept payment was insufficient to negate her obligation to pay rent.
    • The demand for payment and subsequent filing of the complaint were timely, negating the laches defense.

Findings on Ownership and Lease Agreement

  • The appellate court found that the question of ownership was factual and supported by the trial court's findings.
  • Tengco's argument regarding the lease agreement being with Cifra's mother was dismissed, as the trial court's determination of Cifra as the lessor was upheld.
  • The court noted that a tenant cannot deny the title of the landlord at the commencement of the landlord-tenant relationship.

Analysis of Mora Accipiendi

  • Tengco's claim of mora accipiendi was rejected, as the refusal to accept payment was justified due to the transfer of ownership to Cifra.
  • The court highlighted that the lease agreement was verbal and unrecorded, thus ceasing to have effect upon the sale of the property.

Conclusion on Laches and Final Jud...continue reading


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.