Title
Tan vs. Cinco
Case
G.R. No. 213054
Decision Date
Jun 15, 2016
A loan default led to a collection case, with execution of judgment by Makati RTC. Parañaque RTC nullified the auction sale, violating judicial stability; SC ruled Parañaque RTC lacked jurisdiction, voiding its orders.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 213054)

Collection Proceedings and Execution of Judgment

Respondents sued Dante before the Makati RTC (Civil Case No. 01-357). On May 21, 2002, the court ordered payment of ₱100.1 million plus interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. Appeals failed, leading to the issuance of a writ of execution on February 16, 2005. Deputy Sheriff Ignacio levied on Dante’s titled property (TCT No. 126981) and conducted a judicial auction on March 29, 2005. Dante presented his wife’s affidavit asserting conjugal ownership, but failed to redeem. The Makati RTC denied his omnibus motion to quash and set aside the sale, ruling the property was not a family home exempt from execution or that the conjugal partnership had benefited from the loan.

Nullification Complaint in Parañaque RTC

On May 2, 2007, Teresita Tan filed Civil Case No. 07-0134 in the Parañaque RTC against respondents, Sheriff Ignacio, and the Register of Deeds to nullify the auction sale, cancel the certificate of sale, and annul the final deed of sale in favor of respondents.

Parañaque RTC’s Initial Dismissal and Reconsideration

On July 8, 2010, the Parañaque RTC dismissed the nullification case on res judicata grounds, finding Teresita had actively participated in the Makati proceedings. Upon her motion for reconsideration, it reversed itself on January 6, 2011, holding she was not a party to the collection case and had not waived her right to a separate action. It nullified the auction sale and related documents.

Appeal Attempts and Jurisdictional Misstep

Respondents moved for extension to file a Rule 65 petition in the Court of Appeals but inadvertently withdrew and filed a Notice of Appeal in the Parañaque RTC on June 17, 2011—ten days late. The RTC denied the appeal on August 5, 2011, and denied reconsideration on October 17, 2011.

Court of Appeals Decision Allowing Appeal

In its January 22, 2013 decision, the CA granted the certiorari petition, excused the technical lapse, and directed the Parañaque RTC to allow the late Notice of Appeal. It emphasized prudence in resolving cases on their merits and invoked the non-interference doctrine to prevent Dante’s continued evasion of a final Makati RTC judgment.

Issue on Doctrine of Judicial Stability

The Supreme Court framed the core issue as whether the Parañaque RTC violated the doctrine of judicial stability by entertaining and nullifying execution incidents that pr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.