Title
St. Louis University Laboratory High School Faculty vs. Dela Cruz
Case
A.C. No. 6010
Decision Date
Aug 28, 2006
Atty. Dela Cruz suspended for 4 years: 2 years for bigamous marriage (immoral conduct) and 2 years for unauthorized notarization (malpractice). Pending cases unresolved.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-10952)

Charges Against the Respondent

The disbarment case filed against Atty. Dela Cruz is based on allegations of gross misconduct, grossly immoral conduct, and malpractice. The gross misconduct charges include a pending criminal case of child abuse, allegations of misappropriating funds, and claims of illegal salary deductions. The immoral conduct charge arises from his second marriage while still being legally married to Teresita Rivera. In terms of malpractice, he is accused of notarizing documents after the expiration of his notarial commission in 1987.

Background of Marriages and Notarization Issues

Atty. Dela Cruz married Teresita Rivera on May 31, 1982, but the marriage ended due to irreconcilable differences. In 1989, he remarried Mary Jane Pascua without legally annulling his first marriage, and this subsequent marriage was annulled only in 1994. During the period from 1988 to 1997, he notarized multiple documents despite lacking the necessary commission, leading to allegations of malpractice.

Investigation Findings by the IBP

Upon referral to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), the investigation confirmed Dela Cruz's admissions regarding the second marriage and the notarization of documents without a valid commission. The IBP recommended a suspension of two years, one year for the immoral conduct of contracting a second marriage and another for the malpractice of notarizing expired documents.

Standards for Attorney Conduct

The Court underlines that practicing law is a privilege contingent upon maintaining good moral character and complying with legal and ethical standards. This extends beyond professional conduct and encompasses personal behavior as well, emphasizing a lawyer's obligation to uphold the integrity of the legal profession.

Court's Reasoning on Immoral Conduct

While the Court recognized Dela Cruz's actions as immoral, it refrained from labeling them as "grossly immoral." The Court observed mitigating factors such as his lack of romantic involvement between marriages and his continuing support for his wife and child, suggesting that the intent behind his actions did not demonstrate a blatant disregard for legal principles.

Malpractice and Notarization Violations

Dela Cruz's acts of notarizing documents after his commission had expired were treated seriously due to the significance of notarization in legal proceedings. The Court reaffirmed that failing to fulfill this requirement undermines public trust in the legal system and equated the actions to both malpractice and potential criminal activity.

Penalty Imposi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.