Title
St. John Colleges, Inc. vs. St. John Academy Faculty and Employees Union
Case
G.R. No. 167892
Decision Date
Oct 27, 2006
SJCI closed its high school to avoid union negotiations, later reopening it; SC ruled it as unfair labor practice and illegal dismissal, not an illegal strike.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 167892)

Events Leading to Dispute

Prior to 1998, the Academy, employing around 80 personnel, faced a bargaining deadlock when SJCI rejected the Union’s proposals for increased benefits during negotiations for a new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) set to expire on May 31, 1997. The Union subsequently staged a strike on November 10, 1997. To address the standoff, both parties eventually agreed to refer the matter to the Secretary of Labor and Employment (SOLE) for resolution, leading to the suspension of strike actions as classes resumed.

High School Closure and Employee Termination

Despite the ongoing negotiation process, on February 22, 1998, SJCI's Board of Directors resolved to recommend the closure of the Academy, which stockholders approved. They cited irreconcilable differences with the Union and safety concerns for students. Closure was executed on March 31, 1998, and while most employees accepted separation compensation, 25 declined and participated in protests from May 4, 1998, marking the beginning of further legal disputes.

Legal Complaints and Resolutions

Following the closure, SJCI filed to declare the subsequent protests unlawful, claiming failure to adhere to procedural strike requirements. Conversely, the Union filed complaints against SJCI alleging ULP, illegal dismissal, and non-payment of benefits, asserting that the closure was a tactic to undermine collective bargaining rights. This led to the two cases being consolidated, with the Labor Arbiter initially dismissing the Union's complaints but later reversed by the NLRC, which found SJCI guilty of ULP and illegal dismissal, ordering the reinstatement of affected employees with backwages and damages.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals affirmed the NLRC's ruling while modifying the computation of backwages to exclude unworked summer vacation. SJCI’s subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court primarily targeted the issues of liability for ULP and the legality of the Union’s protest actions.

Supreme Court's Rationale on ULP and Closure

The Supreme Court found SJCI liable for ULP and illegal dismissal under Article 283 of the Labor Code, which requires specific conditions for lawful business closure. The Court noted that while two of the requirements were met, namely prior notice, the motivations for closure were questioned. The essential element of good faith in the closure was not established, given the evidence suggesting that the closure aimed primarily to circumvent the Union's bargaining rights.

Evidence and Timing Considerations

Evidence indicated that the closure and subsequent reopening of the high school just a year later necessitated scrutiny of SJCI's motivations. The Court considered not only the timing of closure amidst ongoing negotiations but also the swift maneuvering to open alternative educational services, indicating potentially bad faith in the closure decision aimed at diminishing the Union’s bargaining power.

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.