Case Summary (G.R. No. 170924)
Factual Background
The Torres spouses secured a credit line from the Philippine Commercial and International Bank (PCIB) in 1995, later merged with Equitable Bank, leading to the formation of EPCIB. They financed their operations through a credit line of up to Php 25 million secured by a real estate mortgage on their property. By September 2001, the petitioners defaulted on a loan obligation totaling Php 18.3 million. The petitioners proposed several payment schemes, but after negotiation, they settled on terms suggested by EPCIB that required annual payments. Despite this agreement, they failed to make their scheduled payments, prompting EPCIB to issue demand letters and ultimately file for extrajudicial foreclosure of the mortgaged property.
Procedural History
On the eve of the foreclosure, the petitioners filed a complaint for declaratory relief and injunction against EPCIB in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), securing a temporary restraining order (TRO) that prevented the foreclosure sale. The RTC later granted a writ of preliminary injunction to the petitioners, which led EPCIB to appeal to the Court of Appeals (CA) for certiorari. The CA reversed the RTC’s orders, finding grave abuse of discretion.
Issues Presented
The key issues revolve around whether there was a novation of the contract regarding the loan obligations and whether the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction were met.
Court's Analysis on Novation
The Supreme Court found that no novation occurred in the contractual obligations between the parties. Novation, as a concept in civil law, requires the existence of a previous valid obligation, agreement to a new contract, extinguishment of the old contract, and a valid new contract. Despite the petitioners’ claims that their partial payments implied a change in the terms of the agreed payment schedule, the evidence presented showed that EPCIB consistently demanded the full payments owed. The Court determined that the original obligation remained in force and was not altered by the partial payments.
Court's Ruling on Preliminary Injunction
The Court upheld the CA’s decision, stating that the petitioners failed to demonstrate the clear and unmistakable right necessary for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction. The requisites for such a writ include the existence of an actual and clear right, substantial invasion of such a right, urgent need for the writ to prevent irreparable injury, and lack of adequate remedy at law. The Court
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 170924)
Case Overview
- Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of the Philippines
- G.R. No.: 179441
- Date of Decision: August 09, 2010
- Division: First Division
- Petitioner Parties: St. James College, Jaime T. Torres (deceased), Myrna M. Torres, represented by James Kenley M. Torres.
- Respondent Party: Equitable PCI Bank (EPCIB).
Background of the Case
- Petitioners operated St. James College, a sole proprietorship, which secured a credit line of up to PhP 25,000,000 from the Philippine Commercial and International Bank (PCIB) in 1995.
- The credit was secured by a real estate mortgage (REM) on a 19,225 square meter parcel of land in Parañaque, covered by TCT No. 74598.
- After multiple renewals, the outstanding loan amount reached PhP 18,300,000 by September 2001, with petitioners defaulting on payments.
Attempts to Restructure Debt
- Petitioners proposed several payment schemes to EPCIB, including equal quarterly installments and a long-term loan structure.
- EPCIB rejected these proposals but offered a restructuring plan with a fixed interest rate of 13.375% per annum, allowing petitioners to pay PhP 6,100,000 annually.
- Jaime Torres accepted the latter plan, indicated by his signature on EPCIB's January 9, 2003 letter.
Payment Defaults and Bank Actions
- Petitioners failed to make the scheduled payment in May 2003, resulting in demand letters from EPCIB.
- Partial p