Title
Supreme Court
Social Security System vs. Hon. Gina M. Bibat-Palamos, in her capacity as Acting Presiding Judge of Branch 108, Regional Trial Court of Pasay City
Case
G.R. No. 231145
Decision Date
Jun 26, 2023
NGCP sought to expropriate SSS-occupied land for a substation project, but withdrew the complaint, rendering the case moot; Supreme Court dismissed the petition.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 231145)

Factual Background

NGCP, a private corporation authorized by Republic Act No. 9511, filed a complaint for expropriation on July 16, 2015, seeking to acquire a 46,218 square meter parcel of land registered under the Republic of the Philippines and occupied by SSS. The expropriation was initiated to facilitate the construction of the Pasay 230kV Substation Project, intended to address the growing electricity demand in the Greater Manila Area. After the complaint's amendment and filing of an urgent motion for provisional deposit valuing the property at PHP 1,460,928,000.00, the RTC directed NGCP to deposit this amount as a prerequisite for acquiring possession.

RTC's Ruling

In its March 2, 2017 Order, the RTC granted NGCP's motion for a writ of possession, asserting that the issuance of such a writ was mandated by Section 6 of Republic Act No. 10752, which governs expropriation procedures following a provisional deposit. SSS opposed this decision and sought reconsideration, which was denied by the RTC on April 24, 2017.

Legal Issues Raised

SSS presented several key arguments in its petition for certiorari. Primarily, it contended that:

  1. The hierarchy of courts should allow for direct recourse to the Supreme Court due to the substantial public interest at stake concerning NGCP's ability to initiate expropriation proceedings without proper authorization from the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) or the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC).
  2. The RTC significantly abused its discretion as RA 10752's provisions were exclusive to national government projects and did not extend to private corporations like NGCP.
  3. The jurisdiction to initiate expropriation proceedings under RA 10752 necessarily required involvement from the OSG or OGCC.
  4. NGCP's expropriation authority could not extend to property that was already in public use, which was a pertinent issue given SSS's occupation of the land.
  5. The writ of possession was issued prematurely, without a determination regarding NGCP's authority in this expropriation.

Proceedings and Subsequent Developments

On June 21, 2017, the Supreme Court suspended the implementation of the RTC's orders through a status quo ante order. Following various motions and memoranda filed by both parties, NGCP subsequently pursued a motion to remand the case back to the RTC, indicating a change in its project planning and an intent to withdraw its expropriation complaint entirely. The RTC o

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.