Title
SSS Employees Association vs. Soriano
Case
G.R. No. L-18081
Decision Date
Nov 18, 1963
SSS classified as a GOCC performing proprietary functions, not exempt from taxes on imports, and governed by labor laws due to business-like operations.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-27683)

Evidence for Petitioner

The petitioner submitted multiple pieces of evidence, including consolidated balance sheets of the SSS for the years 1958 to 1962, showcasing a significant increase in total assets and income. For instance, the total assets rose from P17,234,869.61 in 1958 to P194,424,319.38 in 1962, with corresponding income growth. Additionally, the petitioner provided internal documents such as Resolution No. 669 of the SSS, which inquired whether a proposed construction project would be subject to oversight by the Bureau of Public Works, indicating the governance complexity of the SSS. Further documentation included letters denying customs exemption requests based on the Secretary of Finance's resolution and public information materials classifying the SSS under Republic Act 2254, aligning itself with government-owned corporations.

Evidence for Respondents

The respondents countered with evidence demonstrating the operational structure of the SSS, including organizational charts and employee position descriptions. They forwarded various regulatory documents relevant to the Social Security Act of 1954, asserting the quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial powers held by the SSS. An agreement acknowledging PAFLU as the sole bargaining agent was also presented, alongside a resolution indicating management’s responsibility for paying salaries during strikes. They provided an actuarial study and testimonies from SSS officials pointing toward the urgency and necessity for the SSS to operate with business efficiency akin to private entities, thus contesting the petitioner's exemption claim.

Discussion of Legal Issues

The legal contention focuses on whether the SSS qualifies for tax exemptions as a government entity. The Secretary of Finance's letter specified that the SSS functions similarly to a business corporation, indicating its proprietary nature which excludes it from tax exemptions designed for strictly governmental institutions. Furthermore, the construction of a facility by the SSS raised questions regarding its supervisory requirements. It highlighted a collective view from various government offices expressing that while the SSS has some governmental functions, its core operations are more aligned with those of a corporation that engages in proprietary activities.

Conclusion of Findings

The court found that the SSS

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.