Title
Supreme Court
Spouses Sy vs. Andok's Litson Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 192108
Decision Date
Nov 21, 2012
Lessor Sy breached lease obligations by failing to address delays in billboard construction and unpaid MERALCO bill, leading to rescission and damages awarded to Andokas.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 201176)

Facts of the Case

The dispute arose from a lease contract between Cely Sy, as the lessor, and Andokas Litson Corporation, as the lessee, concerning a 316 square-meter lot in Manila, leased for five years with stipulated rent and deposit payments totaling P480,000.00. Andokas alleged a breach of contract due to Sy’s failure to settle an unpaid electricity bill, causing delays in the construction of their outlet. Subsequent delays from another tenant, Mediapool, Inc., further hindered Andokas's operations, culminating in a complaint for rescission filed in early 2008 after Sy's inaction on multiple requests for resolution.

Trial Court Proceedings

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) scheduled a pre-trial for May 26, 2008. However, Sy failed to appear, and her motion to reset the pre-trial due to another hearing was denied. Consequently, the RTC allowed Andokas to present its case ex-parte. On July 24, 2008, the RTC ruled in favor of Andokas, awarding damages for breach of contract, while dismissing Sy's counterclaim.

Court of Appeals Ruling

On appeal, Sy contended that her absence constituted a deprivation of her right to present evidence. However, the Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC’s decision, emphasizing Sy’s repeated failures to fulfill her obligations under the lease. The appellate court justified the ex-parte ruling by determining that Sy's motion for postponement was unsubstantiated and highlighted the significant disruptions caused by her inaction.

Supreme Court Analysis of Due Process

The Supreme Court held that the denial of postponement did not infringe upon Sy's right to due process, indicating that reasonable opportunities to present evidence had been afforded. The Court referenced prior doctrine affirming that due process is preserved when parties can adequately defend their interests within judicial proceedings.

Central Issue of Rescission

Article 1191 of the Civil Code recognizes the right to rescind obligations in reciprocal contracts, such as leases. Through Article 1659, it is established that if either party fails to uphold their obligations (i.e., the lessor to ensure the lessee's enjoyment of the property), the aggrieved party is entitled to rescission or damages.

Breach of Obligation

The Court determined that Sy had failed to maintain the premises or address the issues raised by Andokas, thus constituting a breach of her contractual obligations. Sy's inability to resolve the unpaid MERALCO bills compounded the alleged breaches, supporting the rescissi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.