Case Summary (G.R. No. L-5691)
Background of the Complaint
The case arose from a complaint filed by Byron and Maria Luisa Saunders against Atty. Lyssa Grace S. Pagano-Calde for misappropriating P530,000. The Saunders sought legal services from Pagano-Calde regarding a property transaction involving their brother, Virgilio J. Gaerlan, for which a Deed of Conditional Sale was allegedly executed. The complainants provided Pagano-Calde with funds to be held in trust for their mother, Adelia J. Gaerlan, as part of this transaction and incurred additional expenses related to it.
Allegations and Claims
Following the unsuccessful transaction, the complainants attempted to retrieve their funds. Pagano-Calde responded by asserting the money was secured in a term deposit. However, she could not provide any documentation to substantiate her claim. Complainants accused her of refusal to meet and discuss the status of the ongoing civil case and the funds. Contrarily, Pagano-Calde claimed the sum was delivered to Adelia in November 2005 as per the Conditional Sale agreement, providing an Acknowledgment Receipt allegedly signed by Adelia, which was later disputed by the complainants.
Initiation of Criminal Proceedings
Due to Pagano-Calde’s failure to return the funds, the complainants filed a criminal case for estafa, asserting that the Acknowledgment Receipt was fabricated and introduced only post-filing of the criminal complaint. The investigation revealed multiple testimonies and an NBI report indicating discrepancies in the signature on the receipt. This context led to the filing of an administrative complaint with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines.
Findings of the IBP Commission
The IBP Commission on Bar Discipline concluded it could not resolve the issue of Pagano-Calde’s alleged misappropriation due to the ongoing criminal proceedings, recommending the dismissal of the complaint without prejudice. This recommendation was adopted by the Board of Governors.
Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court rejected the IBP-CBD's recommendation, clarifying that disciplinary actions against lawyers are independent of any criminal proceedings. It emphasized the necessity of maintaining the integrity of the legal profession and highlighted that administrative accountability does not hinge upon the outcomes of criminal cases.
Breach of Professional Conduct
The Court identified clear breaches of the professional conduct expected from lawyers, specifically pointing to the Code of Professional Responsibility, including Canons 16 and 17, which mandate that lawyers maintain trust in h
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. L-5691)
Case Overview
- This case involves a complaint filed by spouses Byron and Maria Luisa Saunders against Atty. Lyssa Grace S. Pagano-Calde for the alleged misappropriation of funds amounting to P530,000.
- The complaint was brought before the Supreme Court under A.C. No. 8708, which was decided on August 12, 2015, and is reported in 766 Phil. 341.
Background of the Case
- The complainants engaged the respondent’s legal services regarding a property sale and a partition case involving a property located at 1 Tacay Road, Quezon Hill, Baguio City.
- The property in question was registered under the name of Virgilio J. Gaerlan, who is the brother of complainant Maria Luisa.
- A Deed of Conditional Sale was purportedly executed on January 12, 2005, where Maria Luisa was to buy the property from Virgilio, represented by their mother, Adelia J. Gaerlan.
Financial Transactions
- The complainants provided the respondent with:
- P500,000 as a partial payment for the property, to be held in trust for Adelia.
- P60,000 for various expenses, including publication of summons, a commissioner's fee, and preparation of Adelia’s last will and testament.
- The sale did not materialize, leading to the filing of a partition case for the subject property.
Demand for Return of Funds
- In 2007, the complainants sought the return of their funds totaling P530,000 from the respondent.
- The respondent claimed the funds were in a term deposit but was unable to provide proof of such deposit or meet the complainants to discuss the matter.
- Respondent contended that on November 14, 2005, she had turned over the P500,000 to Adelia, supported by an Acknowledgment Receipt purportedly signed by Adelia.