Title
Spouses Lim vs. Guasch
Case
A.M. No. R-711-P
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1993
Deputy Sheriff Oscar Guasch dismissed for illegal exaction, dishonesty, and gross negligence in executing a writ, forfeiting retirement benefits.

Case Summary (A.M. No. R-711-P)

Allegations

The complainants filed a Joint Complaint-Affidavit against Deputy Sheriff Guasch alleging illegal exaction, causing undue injury, gross negligence, and bad faith. It was claimed that Guasch unlawfully demanded monetary payments under the guise of “guards fees” and other expenses without issuing receipts, which they argued was contrary to the standard procedures governing sheriff fees as prescribed by the Rules of Court.

Events Leading to the Complaint

In the execution of the writ, Guasch seized personal property from the defendants and scheduled an auction sale. However, the complainants alleged that Guasch did not show up on the auction day, did not secure the levied property, and failed to follow procedural requirements, which led to the removal of the levied items by the judgment debtors.

Respondent's Defense Claims

Guasch denied the allegations, contending that he did not demand money and that the complainants were not present when he arrived at the auction location. He stated that all actions taken were consistent with protocol and that any failure to conduct the auction was due to the complainants' absence.

Investigative Proceedings

The case was referred to Judge Rebecca G. Salvador for investigation, during which both parties presented evidence and witnesses. The Investigating Judge concluded that the complainants provided substantial evidence corroborating their claims, while the denials made by Guasch were deemed unreliable and unconvincing.

Findings of the Investigating Judge

The Investigating Judge's report indicated that the actions of Deputy Sheriff Guasch were indeed dishonest and exhibited gross misconduct. The judge noted that Guasch’s actions amounted to a dereliction of duty and undermined the execution process by failing to arrange for the protection and security of the levied property.

Legal Violations

It was determined that Guasch's demands for fees were not authorized under Rule 141 of the Rules of Court. The investigation highlighted that such unauthorized demands, compounded by his absence during scheduled duties, constituted serious misconduct and dishonesty.

Court Resolution

The Court agreed with the findings of the Investigati

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.