Title
Supreme Court
Spouses Delos Reyes vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 129103
Decision Date
Sep 3, 1999
Daluyong Gabriel sued to recover land after Renato Gabriel orally sold 300 sqm to delos Reyes, who built a commercial structure. SC ruled the sale void due to lack of written authority, ordered refund of P90,000, and denied claims for improvements.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 129103)

Background of the Case

Daluyong Gabriel owned the subject property, inherited from his father, and appointed his sister, Maria Rita, as the administratrix while he lived in Mandaluyong, Metro Manila. On June 21, 1985, a lease contract was made with Lydia De Los Reyes. Later, this lease was novated on September 26, 1985, to a new contract involving Renato Gabriel. In November 1987, Lydia verbally agreed to buy a total of 300 square meters of land from Daluyong’s estate, for which she made several payments, though no formal sale document was executed.

Dispute and Initial Legal Actions

Conflict arose when Daluyong Gabriel directly objected to the construction of a building by the De Los Reyes couple on the property, leading him to demand they vacate. Daluyong initiated legal action in November 1989 for recovery of possession, while the De Los Reyes couple counterclaimed for specific performance, asserting their right to the property based on the alleged sale by Renato.

Trial Court Decision

The Regional Trial Court admitted the oral sale's validity, ordering the execution of necessary documents to transfer the property to the De Los Reyes couple, highlighting that Daluyong had tacitly authorized Renato to sell the property.

Court of Appeals Ruling

Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision, deeming the sale invalid on the grounds that Renato lacked the authority to sell as he was not the registered owner of the land nor did he possess authorization from his father, Daluyong. The appellate court further established that as a matter of law, any sale by an unauthorized agent is void ab initio.

Legal Arguments and Considerations

The petitioners argued that despite the lack of formal authority on Renato's part at the time of sale, the subsequent inheritance by him after Daluyong's death validated the sale. The petitioners also contended that by their actions, Daluyong had ratified the sale. The respondents countered that the petitioners' arguments changed during the course of litigation, and stressed Renato's lack of ownership at the time of the claimed sale.

Supreme Court Analysis

The Supreme Court emphasized that consent and capacity are fundamental to the validity of contracts. It upheld the Court of Appeals' ruling that Renato had no authority to sell the land, thereby rendering the contra

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.