Title
Spouses Buffe vs. Gonzalez
Case
A.C. No. 8168
Decision Date
Oct 12, 2016
Karen Silverio-Buffe's appointment as prosecutor was contested; allegations of political interference led to a dismissed administrative case due to jurisdiction issues and respondent's death.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 8168)

Appointment and Initial Actions

On July 15, 2008, Karen M. Silverio-Buffe was appointed as a Prosecutor I/Assistant Provincial Prosecutor in Romblon province by then-President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. Following her appointment, she took her oath of office on August 15, 2008, but encountered challenges in reporting to work due to the lack of communication regarding her appointment from the Department of Justice (DOJ). Concerned by these developments, the Provincial Prosecutor of Romblon sought clarification from Secretary Gonzalez regarding Silverio-Buffe's appointment status.

Allegations Against Respondents

Subsequently, on December 19, 2008, Secretary Gonzalez issued a memorandum ordering Silverio-Buffe to cease performing her duties as a prosecutor, asserting that she had no official appointment. In response, on February 11, 2009, the Buffes filed a Joint Complaint-Affidavit alleging that Congressman Madrona had influenced Gonzalez and Exconde against Silverio-Buffe’s appointment out of personal animosity related to her involvement in a civil case against a radio station that was opposed to Madrona.

Responses from Respondents

Madrona denied all allegations and asserted that the claims were unsubstantiated, based merely on conjecture and hearsay. He countered with accusations against the complainants for their alleged deceitful conduct in court proceedings. Gonzalez and Exconde also argued that the complaint lacked jurisdiction and merit, contending that the appropriate forum for the allegations was the Office of the Ombudsman, not the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP).

Initial Proceedings and Investigations

The case was escalated through formal channels, leading to various resolutions and recommendations from investigative bodies. Investigating Commissioner Oliver A. Cachapero found merit in the complaint and recommended a censure for the respondents. However, the IBP Board of Governors later reversed this recommendation, dismissing the complaint against the respondents in June 2012 and reaffirming their dismissal in March 2013 in response to a motion for reconsideration filed by the complainants.

Jurisdictional Considerations

The core issue of the case involved determining the jurisdiction over the administrative complaints against the respondents. The Supreme Court found that the allegations against former Undersecretary Exconde and Congressman Madrona fell under the purview of the Office of the Ombudsman. Their official actions, which the co

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.