Title
Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center-Aquaculture Department vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 86773
Decision Date
Feb 14, 1992
SEAFDEC-AQD, an international organization, claimed immunity from suit in a labor dispute over unpaid separation benefits; SC ruled NLRC lacked jurisdiction.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 86773)

Establishment and Nature of SEAFDEC-AQD

SEAFDEC-AQD is a department of an international organization established through an agreement signed on December 28, 1967, by member governments of Southeast Asia, including the Philippines, and sponsored by Japan. It was created to promote fisheries development through mutual cooperation among member states. The Aquaculture Department was organized in 1973 in Iloilo to focus on aquaculture research. As an international organization, SEAFDEC-AQD enjoys functional independence and is not subject to local state control.

Employment and Termination of Juvenal Lazaga

Juvenal Lazaga was employed by SEAFDEC-AQD first as a probationary Research Associate in 1975 and subsequently promoted to Senior External Affairs Officer and Professional III with leadership of the External Affairs Office. On May 8, 1986, petitioner Lacanilao, as Chief, notified Lazaga of his termination due to financial constraints, assuring him separation benefits based on his length of service. Lazaga's claim for unpaid separation benefits resulted in filing a complaint before the NLRC.

Proceedings Before the National Labor Relations Commission

Lazaga filed a complaint for non-payment of separation pay, moral damages, and attorney’s fees. Petitioners countered, challenging the NLRC’s jurisdiction on the ground that SEAFDEC-AQD’s status as an international organization granted it immunity from local jurisdiction. They also raised Lazaga’s alleged outstanding accountability for property and non-fulfillment of clearance requirements. The labor arbiter ruled in favor of Lazaga, ordering payment of separation benefits amounting to ₱126,458.89 plus interest, damages, and attorney’s fees. The NLRC affirmed the award except for damages and attorney’s fees, which it deemed unsupported.

Jurisdictional Immunity of SEAFDEC-AQD

SEAFDEC-AQD’s status as an international agency grants it immunity from local jurisdiction under principles of international law. The Agreement Establishing SEAFDEC, to which the Philippines is a signatory, stipulates that the national laws of member states apply only in limited respects related to contributions made to the organization. The organization’s governance lies with its Council, vesting SEAFDEC with functional autonomy immune from interference by the host country’s judiciary or administrative agencies. This immunity aims to preserve impartiality and independence from local political influence or legal processes, especially in management and operational decisions.

Legal Basis for Immunity and Jurisdictional Issues

Precedents and scholarly authorities recognize international organizations as possessing distinct juridical personality, granting them immunity from local legal processes. The Philippine Department of Justice previously opined that SEAFDEC’s immunity bars local courts and tribunals, such as the NLRC, from asserting jurisdiction, as this could result in unwanted interference. Jurisdiction is a matter of law and cannot be conferred by consent or estoppel. The petitioners argued that the NLRC lacked jurisdiction ab initio, rendering its decisions void.

Rejection

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.