Title
Supreme Court
South Cotabato Communications Corp. vs. Sto. Tomas
Case
G.R. No. 173326
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2010
Labor violations at DXCP Radio Station led to DOLE orders for payment; procedural errors in appeal dismissed by CA, remanded by SC for merits review.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 173326)

Applicable Law

The legal framework governing this case includes the provisions of the Labor Code of the Philippines and the rules regarding administrative proceedings before the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), as well as procedural rules outlined in the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure.

Background of the Dispute

The dispute arose from a complaint filed against the petitioners regarding multiple labor law violations identified during an inspection of the DXCP Radio Station on January 13, 2004. Notably cited violations included the underpayment of minimum wage, failure to pay the 13th month pay, non-remittance of Social Security System (SSS) premiums, and non-payment of various employee benefits. Following the inspections, the DOLE required the petitioners to rectify these violations within a specified timeframe.

Findings and Orders from DOLE

On May 20, 2004, the Regional Director of DOLE ordered the petitioners to pay a total of Php759,752 to affected employees, affirming the findings of labor law violations. Both the appeal submitted to Secretary Sto. Tomas and the subsequent motion for reconsideration were dismissed, with the Secretary supporting the notion that due process was granted to the petitioners throughout the administrative proceedings.

Appeal to Court of Appeals

The petitioners' efforts to challenge the DOLE orders led to a petition for certiorari at the Court of Appeals. However, the court dismissed the petition due to several procedural errors, including improper verification and lack of a certification against forum shopping, which resulted in a dismissal based on insufficient compliance with procedural rules.

Court of Appeals' Rationale for Dismissal

The Court of Appeals highlighted that the petition was not properly verified and that the certificate of non-forum shopping was incorrectly executed, causing the petition to lack legal standing. It also noted that annexes to the petition were not certified true copies and that counsel's failure to provide the IBP official receipt number further compounded the procedural deficiencies.

Motion for Reconsideration

Upon filing a motion for reconsideration, the petitioners were only partially successful. The Court of Appeals recognized some improvements in compliance concerning document attachments but maintained that the main procedural misstep regarding the verification and certification signature remained unresolved.

Supreme Court's Analysis of Procedural Issues

Upon review, the Supreme Court underscored the authority of corporate officers, specifically a corporation's president, to file certifications and verifications without the necessity of a board resolution. The Court clarified that while it is best practice to provide said reso

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.