Title
Solivio vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 83484
Decision Date
Feb 12, 1990
Dispute over Esteban Javellana Jr.'s estate between maternal and paternal aunts; probate court ruled exclusive jurisdiction, no extrinsic fraud, reserva troncal inapplicable, and foundation agreement binding.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 83484)

Petition for Administration and Declaration of Sole Heir

Celedonia, designated special administratrix, filed Special Proceeding No. 2540 on March 8, 1977, later amending to seek letters of administration and declaration as sole heir. Citing her status as the nearest maternal relative and to facilitate the proposed foundation, she secured a published notice and hearing. On April 3, 1978, the court declared her sole heir and instructed her to complete estate settlement.

Partition Suit and Lower Courts’ Decisions

After her motion for reconsideration was denied for tardiness, Concordia did not appeal but on January 7, 1980 instituted Civil Case No. 13207 in RTC Branch 26 for partition, reconveyance of ownership, possession, and damages. The RTC on September 3, 1984 ruled in her favor, ordering inventory, accounting, and execution of judgment despite pending probate. The Court of Appeals affirmed on January 26, 1988.

Jurisdictional Exclusivity of Probate Proceedings

The Supreme Court held that while probate in rem remains pending—and no order of distribution has closed the estate—the probate court (RTC, Branch 23) retains exclusive jurisdiction over heirship and distribution. Concordia’s independent action in a co-equal court violated this principle and risked conflicting adjudications. Her remedy lay in certiorari review of the probate court’s denial, not a separate partition suit.

Extrinsic Fraud Allegation

Concordia’s claim that Celedonia employed extrinsic fraud to secure sole heirship was rejected. She had actual and constructive notice of the special proceedings by personal knowledge and by publication in two local papers. No fraudulent scheme deprived her of a day in court. Her election to stay away, and her admitted agreement with Celedonia to pursue the foundation plan, disqualified any charge of extrinsic fraud.

Inapplicability of Reserva Troncal

Article 891’s reserva troncal attaches only when an ascendant inherits gratuitously from a descendant who had acquired from another ascendant or sibling. Here, Esteban, Jr. was the descendant, and his inheritance from his mother did not trigger the reservation in favor of Celedonia. Instead, collateral succession under Articles 1003 and 1009 grants each aunt, as relative within the third degree, an equal one-half share.

Foundation Agreement and Its Legal Effect

Both a judicial and factual admission by Concordia confirm that she and Celedonia agreed to transfer the entire estate to the Salustia Solivio Vda. de Javellana Foundation to fulfill Esteban’s last wishes. Judicial admissions are conclusive, an

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.