Title
Social Security System vs. Aguas
Case
G.R. No. 165546
Decision Date
Feb 27, 2006
SSS pension claim contested; Rosanna denied benefits due to separation, Jeylnn granted as Pablo's legitimate child; Janet excluded as unproven adopted child.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 165546)

Applicable Law

The laws relevant to this case include Republic Act No. 1161, as amended by Presidential Decree No. 735, which pertains to the entitlement of death benefits from the SSS, particularly sections that define dependents and beneficiaries.

Case Background

Following Pablo's death, Rosanna filed for death benefits on December 13, 1996, claiming support for herself and their minor daughter Jeylnn. The SSS initially processed her claim but later suspended the pension payments based on allegations from Leticia, who questioned Rosanna's legitimacy as a beneficiary, asserting that she abandoned the family and had children with another man, Romeo dela PeAa.

Investigation and Findings

An investigation by the SSS revealed that Rosanna had indeed lived with Dela PeAa after abandoning Pablo, and evidence purportedly indicated that Jeylnn was not Pablo's biological daughter but rather belonged to Dela PeAa. The decision of the SSS to suspend benefits was premised on a report asserting that Pablo was incapable of fathering children due to infertility.

Social Security Commission (SSC) Ruling

In a decision dated March 14, 2001, the SSC ruled against Rosanna and her claims. It concluded Rosanna was not a primary beneficiary due to her alleged infidelity and subsequent marriage to Dela PeAa while still married to Pablo. The SSC also found that Jeylnn's legitimacy was called into question, inferring based on testimonies that her birth was not legitimate.

Court of Appeals

Rosanna and her children appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which on September 9, 2003, reversed the SSC ruling, recognizing the birth certificates as binding evidence and affirming that Rosanna was still entitled to support. The CA held that the benefit payments to Rosanna and Jeylnn should be restored, as there was insufficient evidence to support the claims of abandonment or infidelity.

Supreme Court's Review

The SSS sought to have the CA’s ruling overturned, arguing that Rosanna's claimed dependency was negated by her relationship with Dela PeAa and questioning the legitimacy of Jeylnn and Janet. The Supreme Court, while focusing on the legal

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.