Title
Small Business Corp. vs. Commission on Audit
Case
G.R. No. 230628
Decision Date
Oct 3, 2017
SB Corp. granted merit increases to officers post-EO No. 7 moratorium; COA disallowed, upheld by Supreme Court, citing lack of GCG approval.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 230628)

Factual Background

The Small Business Corporation, a government-owned and controlled corporation, was established under Republic Act No. 6977. It provides a variety of financial services aimed at supporting small and medium enterprises in the Philippines. The legislative framework around the corporation was expanded with the enactment of the Magna Carta for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in 2008 which allowed the Board to structure its compensation separate from the Salary Standardization Law, albeit within certain legal constraints. Subsequently, a moratorium on salary increases was imposed via Executive Order No. 7 from September 8, 2010, until expressly lifted by the President.

Procedural History

In April 2013, SB Corp. awarded merit increases to five officers. However, after a request for confirmation with the Governance Commission for Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations (GCG) was denied, the COA issued a Notice of Disallowance on August 27, 2014, citing violations of EO No. 7. The COA rejected SB Corp.'s appeals, reiterating that the incurring of expenses was unauthorized due to the prevailing moratorium on increases.

Ruling of the COA

Upon the conclusion of the internal appeals, the COA En Banc upheld the validity of the Notice of Disallowance in a decision dated February 16, 2017. The COA determined that despite SB Corp.'s charter exemptions, the moratorium under EO No. 7 still applied because it was in effect when the merit increases were granted. Furthermore, correspondence from SB Corp. to the GCG indicated an acknowledgment of GCG's jurisdiction over such compensation matters.

Issues Raised by the Petitioner

SB Corp. contends that:

  1. The COA erred in ruling that SB Corp.'s Board of Directors did not possess the authority to grant merit increases.
  2. EO No. 7 should apply prospectively, not retroactively, to protect vested rights.
  3. The merit increases were permissible, consistent with approved salary structure guidelines, and previously endorsed by other relevant government agencies.

Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, confirming that the COA did not exhibit grave abuse of discretion in its rulings. The decision highlighted that the remedy of certiorari is reserved for instances showcasing clear jurisdictional errors by the COA, and SB Corp. failed to demonstrate such errors. The Court clarified that the moratorium under EO No. 7 applied to t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.