Title
Sinsuat vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 169106
Decision Date
Jun 23, 2006
Mayoral and vice-mayoral candidates in South Upi contested election results after multiple proclamations, disqualification of a candidate, and alleged ballot tampering. COMELEC annulled proclamations, disqualified Gunsi, and upheld Campong as vice-mayor. SC affirmed COMELEC's ruling, dismissing the petition.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-47405)

Background of the Case

The controversy arises from the local elections held in May 2004, wherein Israel and Jaberael contested their respective positions for mayor and vice mayor in South Upi, Maguindanao. A pre-election complaint was filed by Israel to disqualify Antonio B. Gunsi, Sr. from running for mayor, which led to multiple proclamations by the Municipal Board of Canvassers that were ultimately annulled by the COMELEC for being based on incomplete canvass results.

Relevant Proceedings and Orders

Following the annulments, the COMELEC directed the SBOC to reconvene for a re-canvass of the election returns but faced complications. Notably, when counting ballots from four precincts, contested ballots emerged, which were subject to inquiry as they potentially affected the election results. In a subsequent order, the COMELEC en banc directed the SBOC to proclaim Abdullah Campong for vice-mayor and referenced the matter of mayoral succession to the Department of Interior and Local Government due to Gunsi's disqualification.

Petitioner’s Motions and Issues Raised

The Sinsuats filed multiple motions to suspend the SBOC's actions, which the COMELEC denied. The crux of their argument rests on whether the contested ballots, which had been tampered, should be counted for Jaberael and whether Israel should be declared the duly elected mayor based on Gunsi's disqualification.

Legal Issues Presented

The main issues presented before the Supreme Court involve whether the COMELEC committed grave abuse of discretion by not counting the contested ballots and whether Israel should be proclaimed mayor considering the finality of Gunsi's disqualification before an official proclamation of a winning candidate. Additionally, respondents argued that the matter became moot as Campong had assumed office.

Decision on the First Issue

The Supreme Court ruled that the COMELEC did not gravely abuse its discretion by failing to consider the contested ballots as votes for Jaberael. The court clarified that issues regarding ballot appreciation fall within the purview of election protests, which were not suitable for resolution in a pre-proclamation controversy. The specific ballots challenged were inappropriately scrutinized at the pre-proclamation stage, which is explicitly limited to procedural questions, rendering the SBOC's initial actions sufficient.

Decision on the Second Issue

Regarding the proclamation of Israel as mayor, the Supreme Court upheld that the COMELEC cannot award the mayoral position to the candidate with the second highest votes when the primary candidate (Gunsi, who obtained the highest number of votes) is disqualified. The rationa

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.