Title
Shauf vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 90314
Decision Date
Nov 27, 1990
A Filipino applicant with superior qualifications was denied a guidance counselor position at Clark Air Base due to discriminatory hiring practices. The Supreme Court ruled against the U.S. officials involved, awarding damages for violating her constitutional right to equal employment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 90314)

Administrative and Pre-trial Developments

The U.S. Civil Service Commission requested Isakson’s removal for non-qualification; the Department of the Air Force’s Staff Judge Advocate noted procedural irregularities and advised proper consideration of qualified candidates. Shauf pursued appeals before the U.S. Civil Service Commission while simultaneously filing for damages in Philippine courts.

Trial Court Findings

The RTC denied respondents’ motions to dismiss based on sovereign immunity and administrative-remedy exhaustion. It found both Detwiler and Persi personally liable for discrimination on account of Shauf’s sex, color, and Filipino origin, supported by documentary evidence of misapplication of DOD policies and reprisal in extending incumbents’ appointments. The RTC awarded actual damages of US $39,662.49 (converted at 1976 rates), moral and exemplary damages of P100,000, attorney’s fees (20% of actual damages), and costs.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The CA reversed, holding that the challenged appointments and personnel decisions were sovereign acts of the United States on its base, thus immune from suit under the doctrine of foreign-state immunity and the Military Bases Agreement, and that Philippine courts should not interfere in a purely internal U.S. affair.

Issues for Supreme Court Review

  1. Whether private respondents, U.S. military personnel officers, enjoy sovereign immunity from suit in Philippine courts.
  2. Whether petitioners established discrimination and whether the award of damages was proper.
  3. Whether petitioners’ resort to Philippine courts was barred by pursuit or exhaustion of U.S. administrative remedies.

Sovereign Immunity and Personal Liability

While the 1987 Constitution reaffirms foreign sovereign immunity, the Supreme Court clarified that this immunity does not extend to state officers sued in their personal capacity for acts beyond or without legal authority. Unauthorized, malicious, or discriminatory conduct falls outside sovereign protection. Accordingly, Detwiler and Persi, having committed actionable torts beyond their official mandate, could be held personally liable despite the United States’ status.

Discrimination Findings Upheld

The Supreme Court accorded deference to the RTC’s credibility and factual findings. Persi’s failure to follow DODI 1400.23 and AF Reg 40-301, reliance on CORRO to fill a position reserved for local dependents, and Detwiler’s inconsistent handling of incumbents’ extensions demonstrated discriminatory animus. Documentary evidence—including the EEO examiner’s report, U.S. Civil Service Commission letters, and the Staff Judge Advocate’s memorandum—corroborated deliberate procedural abuse.

Damages

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.