Title
Severino vs. Severino
Case
G.R. No. 18058
Decision Date
Jan 16, 1923
Dispute over 799-hectare land in Silay; Guillermo Severino, as administrator, registered land in his name post-Melecio's death. Court ruled fiduciary duty breached, ordered conveyance to estate.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 18058)

Petitioner and Respondent

Petitioner: Fabiola Severino (and intervenor Felicitas Villanueva as administratrix)
Respondent: Guillermo Severino

Key Dates

• 1901 – Possessory information filed on behalf of Melecio; land entered in Mortgage Law Register
• May 25, 1915 – Death of Melecio Severino
• 1916–1917 – Cadastral proceedings and issuance of Torrens certificates to Guillermo

Applicable Law

• Philippine Civil Code of 1902 (art. 130) and Code of Civil Procedure (sec. 334(1)) – Presumption of natural child status
• Land Registration Act (Act No. 496) – Torrens system, indefeasibility (sec. 38), burdens and incidents (sec. 70), equitable remedies (sec. 102)
• Equity principles on fiduciary duty and trust (agent/trustee estoppel)

Factual Background

Melecio owned a continuous 799-hectare tract in Silay, Occidental Negros. From 1902 until Melecio’s death, Guillermo administered and occupied the land. In 1916 cadastral proceedings, Guillermo (through counsel) claimed and secured Torrens titles to four lots aggregating 799 ha, although Fabiola was a minor and not represented.

Procedural History

Fabiola sued to recover four parcels or P800,000 in damages for wrongful registration. Villanueva intervened on behalf of the estate. The trial court recognized Fabiola as Melecio’s natural child and ordered Guillermo to reconvey 428 ha to the estate and remit mortgage proceeds. Guillermo appealed, raising nine assignments of error.

Issues Presented

  1. Validity of Fabiola’s acknowledgment as natural child
  2. Area and valuation of Melecio’s land
  3. Allegations of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty by Guillermo
  4. Effect of Torrens registration on equitable claims
  5. Procedural questions on attachment

Trial Court’s Findings

• Fabiola is an acknowledged natural child entitled to inheritance
• Melecio’s estate comprised 428 ha at death
• Land value at P500/ha was reasonable
• Guillermo obtained Torrens titles by fraud and must reconvey

Recognition of Natural Child

Although indispensable heirs were omitted, the appellate court deemed this issue immaterial to Villanueva’s relief. The presumption favoring natural child status under Civil Code art. 130 and CCP sec. 334(1) sufficed, and final probate can settle Fabiola’s status.

Determination of Land Area

Guillermo’s 1913 sworn testimony and 1901 possessory records justified the trial court’s finding of 428 ha, notwithstanding Melecio’s 1906 tax declaration of 324 ha. The discrepancy did not warrant disturbance.

Valuation and Attachment

The court’s P500/ha estimate was within reason; the ex parte preliminary attachment and its refusal to dissolve did not constitute reversible error.

Fiduciary Duty and Equitable Relief

Guillermo held the land as Melecio’s agent and cestui que trust. Under well-established equity and comparative jurisprudence, an agent who acquires legal title for himself is equitably bound to reconvey to the principal. Fraud need not be separately proved to invoke trustee estoppel.

Effect of Torrens Registration

The action is in





...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.