Title
Supreme Court
Seneres vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 178678
Decision Date
Apr 16, 2009
Dispute over BUHAY party-list leadership and 2007 election nominations; COMELEC upheld Robles' authority under hold-over principle, dismissing SeAeres' challenge.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 202039)

Procedural History

SeAeres petitioned COMELEC on April 17, 2007 to deny due course to Robles’s Certificates for lack of authority and alleged partisan political activity. On May 10, 2007, Buhay’s National Council expelled SeAeres. COMELEC’s en banc, on July 19, 2007, issued Resolution E.M. No. 07-043, recognizing Robles as the duly authorized party president and nominating officer. SeAeres then filed a certiorari petition before the Supreme Court.

Issue

Whether COMELEC acted without or in excess of jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion in issuing Resolution E.M. No. 07-043 and whether certiorari was the proper remedy, given the availability of other legal remedies.

Proper Remedy and Jurisdictional Exclusivity

The Court held that once party-list nominees have been proclaimed, have taken their oaths, and assumed office, contests over their election, returns, or qualifications fall exclusively under the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) pursuant to Art. VI, Sec. 17 of the 1987 Constitution. A petition for quo warranto before the HRET was the proper remedy, not a certiorari petition before the Supreme Court. SeAeres’s failure to file within ten days rendered the COMELEC resolution final and the petition moot.

Partisan Political Activity Argument

SeAeres argued that Robles’s dual role as a civil servant and party president violated the constitutional and statutory prohibition on partisan political activity. The Court rejected this, finding that signing and filing a Certificate of Nomination are internal party processes not intended to enhance the electoral prospects of specific candidates and thus fall outside the definition of electioneering or partisan political activity under the Omnibus Election Code and Civil Service Law.

Hold-Over Principle

Under Sec. 23 of the Corporation Code and established case law, officers continue in office after term expiration until successors are elected

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.