Title
Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. RCBC
Case
G.R. No. 170984
Decision Date
Jan 30, 2009
A P8M manager's check issued by SBTC was deposited by CMC via RCBC; SBTC dishonored it after GCDC issued a stop payment. Courts ruled SBTC liable, awarding RCBC damages, interest, and attorney's fees.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 170984)

Applicable Law

The case is governed by the provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, alongside the Negotiable Instruments Law (Act No. 2031) and relevant sections of the Civil Code regarding damages and obligations.

Factual Background

On January 9, 1981, SBTC issued a manager's check for P8 million, payable to "CASH," as a loan proceeds to Guidon Construction and Development Corporation (GCDC). This check was subsequently deposited by Continental Manufacturing Corporation (CMC) into its account at RCBC, which allowed immediate withdrawal of the amount. On January 12, 1981, GCDC issued a stop payment order to SBTC, prompting SBTC to dishonor the check and return it to RCBC.

Trial Court Proceedings

RCBC filed a damage complaint against SBTC, which was initially lodged with the Court of First Instance of Rizal and later transferred to the Regional Trial Court of Makati City. The court ultimately ruled in favor of RCBC, mandating SBTC to pay PhP4 million as actual damages, along with attorney's fees and costs.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals modified the trial court's decision, affirming the liability of SBTC for the principal amount of P4,000,000.00 but adding an interest of 6% per annum from the filing of the complaint until the finality of the decision. The appellate court, however, denied the claim for attorney's fees due to a lack of legal basis.

Legal Issues Presented

SBTC challenged the appellate court's decision, presenting numerous arguments including the alleged improper exclusion of Central Bank regulations, issues related to the stop payment order, and the legitimacy of RCBC as a holder in due course. RCBC countered with claims for compensatory damages, lost interest income, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees.

Nature of Manager’s Check

The court emphasized that a manager's check, akin to a certified check, represents a primary obligation of the bank as it indicates acceptance upon issuance. As such, RCBC's reliance on the integrity of the check and immediate crediting to CMC's account was justified, rendering SBTC liable.

Discretionary Withdrawal Against Uncollected Deposits

The court dismissed SBTC's defense based on Monetary Board Resolution No. 2202, clarifying that the Central Bank allowed banks to exercise discretion regarding immediate withdrawals for manager's checks. This discretion fully justified RCBC's actions in permitting the withdrawal.

Damages Awarded

Regarding lost interest income claimed by RCBC, the court ruled that this matter was encapsulated within the legal i

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.